From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90117C433B4 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558026124C for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243117AbhDLPur (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:50:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44510 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243042AbhDLPuj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:50:39 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE38AC06138C for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a21so796486oib.10 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:50:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NZYZrqYCNCv2bxpNxPSl3nXWCQe4Fvp0PwQSK0b1hpU=; b=Vx5mpzCj+enoGx9KqcYEWgEiZhKJWzoqSUtR72eSgqZtcWN2ie+bYKb8MbLhjQRfM6 qi1Dy0regakn0YcVsX5B9cGxYuAq3tDrFjwVp1DPcWASoXPSniF0Mv7BKr/CPQmr0yU9 FFKABGEFgXaEFRuqUrTX+iEl6xvNJuRBCqHv6j9B+VRqNmX19gVn76JmwDAQqS0bUUN4 RKSNOqQC4XgBif+68UagaWV8p+YicdH8v3bKF8rjZFqWH2i74qsek+wy3ElqA2Uvc9NI Cue4rBg3IVwo1TGS8CSWF00s1Z0W7oMecfJnU+7uxdDzfikV3sb+iskWOOIk0xY2w1Xq H/XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NZYZrqYCNCv2bxpNxPSl3nXWCQe4Fvp0PwQSK0b1hpU=; b=Gdu/wyu0IhTRUOxYYlrs7dsOYMELP8I4on6U5TdpYQGzdcNbC9ae9G/wu6piz5LljX c+5L7m3XRbAhPJRCFHXQROaN79FwrAEfMNijMLKE+Dv0EkRE6awHocAPKbbLfQ7vZIyV Hg18Gxo83NkpEiNkDpqLMVoJEqAv0t1qo6GcsINFZYBHJpyVMFwZ/4lj96cOFNPW760J IcGZSmp4xh2+rCppIeK4BbXeCawH5P/3hYqPSA4kB1Mqvx/yxcJs6gdtamM+C0ZwzYnj eAqrcEaF6m8chEnP07a+2htFu7OOHqiurY3+yZfLL/6QWQcfytloGvpuPg59FdKK9ox9 1rDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OOsnhlqS/8mJ+RMVzdleiwsnHosVYWX64NDRKrFPqgUkwdEUQ azbzc4lC65XYYIU96kQ6mvxzNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxSaAxYZ9t5xAi07FjyuqSb0/GV2NeW6bl4Gr0VuUqXKbbceEq2bqv5yehZXeYnstbJSoo9w== X-Received: by 2002:aca:f30b:: with SMTP id r11mr10894310oih.133.1618242621027; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([207.135.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm2803640otk.9.2021.04.12.08.50.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/3] Charge loop device i/o to issuing cgroup To: Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton Cc: Dan Schatzberg , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Hugh Dickins , Shakeel Butt , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Yang Shi , Alex Shi , Alexander Duyck , Wei Yang , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , open list , "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" References: <20210402191638.3249835-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <072a9ad4-b63e-e540-9314-f3e3763111f5@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:50:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/12/21 9:45 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > It looks like all feedback has been addressed and there hasn't been > any new activity on it in a while. > > As per the suggestion last time [1], Andrew, Jens, could this go > through the -mm tree to deal with the memcg conflicts? Yep, I think that would make it the most painless for everyone. Dan/Andrew, you can add my Acked-by to the series. -- Jens Axboe