From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] tools lib traceevent: Fix backward compatibility macros for pevent filter enums
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:31:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1398252682-17185-4-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398252682-17185-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The return value for pevent_filter_match() is suppose to return FILTER_NONE
if the event doesn't have a filter, and FILTER_NOEXIST if there is no filter
at all. But the change 41e12e580a7 "tools lib traceevent: Refactor
pevent_filter_match() to get rid of die()" replaced the return value
with PEVENT_ERRNO__* values and added "backward compatibility" macros
that used the old names. Unfortunately, the NOEXIST and NONE macros were
swapped, and this broke users that use the old return names.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140421222346.0351ced4@gandalf.local.home
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
---
tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h
index 791c539..feab942 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h
@@ -876,8 +876,8 @@ struct event_filter {
struct event_filter *pevent_filter_alloc(struct pevent *pevent);
/* for backward compatibility */
-#define FILTER_NONE PEVENT_ERRNO__FILTER_NOT_FOUND
-#define FILTER_NOEXIST PEVENT_ERRNO__NO_FILTER
+#define FILTER_NONE PEVENT_ERRNO__NO_FILTER
+#define FILTER_NOEXIST PEVENT_ERRNO__FILTER_NOT_FOUND
#define FILTER_MISS PEVENT_ERRNO__FILTER_MISS
#define FILTER_MATCH PEVENT_ERRNO__FILTER_MATCH
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-23 11:31 [GIT PULL 0/4] perf/urgent fixes Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf tests x86: Fix memory leak in sample_ustack() Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: Disable libdw unwind for all but x86 arch Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 11:31 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2014-04-23 11:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] tools lib traceevent: Fix memory leak in pretty_print() Jiri Olsa
2014-04-23 13:09 ` [GIT PULL 0/4] perf/urgent fixes Ingo Molnar
2014-04-23 13:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-23 13:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-24 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-24 11:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-25 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-23 14:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-24 6:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-24 11:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-04-25 17:50 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1398252682-17185-4-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®