On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Noever wrote: > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Garrett > wrote: > > Yeah, it seems I don't need the suspend quirk - the NHI is still there > > without it. I still think we should make the quirk general rather than > > tying it to the machines, the worst case is that it'll just do nothing. > Ok, agreed. The "wait" quirk has to run on all machines and the other > one will fail if the ACPI methods are not there. Should I resend the > series or just the patch or should I (or do you want to) make a > separate patch? Probably best to ask Greg - I'm fine with this stuff going through his tree (note to Greg: the Apple ACPI patches I just sent need to be merged before this stuff will work properly) -- Matthew Garrett {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I