From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1774604b-1028-a4b1-a254-b2fb32cd91f1@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCi_ekH0ENU+oUJsQka2XagvY=gk=RDZRfpLFWypKrroQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 23/09/16 15:30, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On 23 September 2016 at 13:58, Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
>> Since commit 7dc603c9028e ("sched/fair: Fix PELT integrity for new
>> tasks") ::last_update_time will be set to a non-zero value in
>> post_init_entity_util_avg(), which leads to p->se.avg.load_avg being
>> decayed on enqueue before the task has even had a chance to run.
>>
>> For a NICE_0 task the sequence of events leading up to this with
>> example load average changes might be,
>>
>> sched_fork()
>> init_entity_runnable_average()
>> p->se.avg.load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight); // 1024
>>
>> wake_up_new_task()
>> post_init_entity_util_avg()
>> attach_entity_load_avg()
>> p->se.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
>>
>> activate_task()
>> enqueue_task()
>> ...
>> enqueue_entity_load_avg()
>> migrated = !sa->last_update_time // false
>> if (!migrated)
>> __update_load_avg()
>> p->se.avg.load_avg = 1002
>
> Does it mean that you can see the perf drop that you mention below
> because load is decayed to 1002 instead of staying to 1024 ?
I think Matt is talking about the fact that the cfs->runnable_load_avg
value is 0 once the hackbench task is initially dequeued.
Without this patch the value of se->avg.load_avg (e.g. both times 1002)
is exactly the same when we add it to cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg in
enqueue_entity_load_avg() and when we subtract it in
dequeue_entity_load_avg(). That's because the initial runtime is short
(~250us on my hikey board).
With this patch we add 1024 and subtract ~1002 which lets
cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg still have a small positive value. This
favours that for the next hackbench task another cpu will be chosen in
(load-based) fork-balance.
>
> 1002 mainly comes from period_contrib being set to 1023 during
> init_entity_runnable_average so any delay longer than 1us between
> attach_entity_load_avg and enqueue_entity_load_avg will trig the decay
> of the load from 1024 to 1002
>
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-23 11:58 Matt Fleming
2016-09-23 14:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-27 13:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2016-09-27 19:24 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-27 19:21 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-28 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 11:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-28 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 11:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-28 11:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-28 12:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-04 21:25 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-04 20:16 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-28 12:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-28 13:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-29 16:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-03 13:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-09-28 17:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-09-28 19:37 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-30 20:30 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-09 3:39 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-10-10 10:01 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-10 10:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-10-11 10:27 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-10 12:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-10 13:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-10 18:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-11 9:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-10-11 10:39 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-18 10:11 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-10 17:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-11 10:24 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-11 13:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-11 18:57 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-12 7:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-18 15:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-18 10:29 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-18 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-18 11:29 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-18 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-19 6:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-19 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-09 16:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-10-04 20:11 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-09 5:57 ` [lkp] [sched/fair] f54c5d4e28: hackbench.throughput 10.6% improvement kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1774604b-1028-a4b1-a254-b2fb32cd91f1@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®