From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEF124501D; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 05:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791179342; cv=none; b=b8gj/66nSzPmjjNpeom2sY6r6g2s3mrmDyATSAzi+VXINm7Lkkx90jnU/gnxPeFIGLOJnfa+FK1iE9JhJ2PIFIWvOvWmZoj8A1YrR6XoXIPPM1dmjkvufed+PR5JXlvOGrYT+8G59qIA0sAcEM0WLU07I5JgVL8HKWqIRBRLUwQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791179342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T80pmibn7aSi6N9hDzJvCBDoLXDCN4HDH9fhrQVJ60g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=qUkWTZwYBl3vtE3SLou2nIZN+beDBPKgE/3Rd8PZnjHQcHFKLOWE6OXuKWLvkMEnrfdC/pVLGgg5OcS16TAqnd8l5Hyw/kXTpMEQ+LfTQiOGPKPK7yIW5LKnOHC6okDDEtR9zk0vVNj4MclfTXfUIvoL7rxCs3g/KbcrLpjHJTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YSsCpoEj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YSsCpoEj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63D441F000FF; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 05:49:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791179341; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=YSsCpoEj/jiGFhsdn1JfX+rTrNdM4VbToR9lCDxmkOXYfv5Ych28ABJJZpZkJQkIw Uk22HYHdeGt8j/fOcuDVrNrzLDPg2B/WPOX9WjXm28uVVdYmc7yTbCxrjkrlscUXZ3 XzsWWECQC7Ok9XY/gM6XzASfWFst5Gh3C93kd0a4zNTRrT134W66ppmfxzkWjTxZPr 8784LzDcUmm0QHyxTbzGFGwIqsCfeAUNXBK7hAdilQZcalcWXeMsn++yq5MIkSI+aL sPm+9ESlGviYbijDRLpcnMQSZ5JucJIFuvqbZ1n0C6XgHZ1g/ewVJj7gNMxwkabcTO Oj3OvAW9McUrg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Harshit Mogalapalli Cc: maheshb@google.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, peterpenkov96@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, error27@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: fix skb length underflow in NAPI frags path Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:48:59 +0000 Message-ID: <179117933970.1402591.17373421517734454461@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261005054224.4154727-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com> References: <20261005054224.4154727-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.