From: Ahmad Reza Cheraghi <a_r_cheraghi@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A Framework to automatically configure a Kernel
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 07:50:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050905145030.90158.qmail@web51003.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431C3665.1090002@cs.aau.dk>
--- Emmanuel Fleury <fleury@cs.aau.dk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ahmad Reza Cheraghi wrote:
> >
> > I install right now a gcc 4.0 debian-packege on my
> > system and it still works. But I attached another
> > patch(I thik I did a mistake in the patch;-)).
>
> Might be as well ! :)
>
> But, I'll give it a try when you'll get this fixed !
>
> >>2) Why is the target called "auconfig" and not
> >>"autoconfig" (just like
> >>we have a "menuconfig") ?
> >
> > I thought that autoconfig will be to large for
> that
> > reaseon i called it auconfig.
>
> Well, "menuconfig" is not that small either ! :)
> More explicit you are, better it is (within some
> reasonable limit).
>
> > If you mean with your question that, why there are
> > less rules and why they don't get its information
> from
> > /sys or /proc etc. The answer will be:
> >
> > Not that much. Most of the information will be
> > obtained from lspci and dmesg. The only one that
> gets
> > its inforamation directly from the I/O of the
> Hardware
> > is lspci. The other one like dmesg, /proc... anre
> > based on the Kernel installation and on drivers
> > installation. And it might happened that you won't
> > find Hardware that are on your system but aren't
> > installed from your Kernel.
>
> It was what I meant (sorry to have been unclear).
>
> > But if you mean with your question, that why it
> dosn't
> > first of all create list of all of the information
> > given from /proc, ...? The answer is:
> >
> > That the basic Idea of the framework is to extend
> it
> > easily. And the rules can be changed they way
> someody
> > knew its right and ok.
>
> Ok.
>
> Regards
> --
> Emmanuel Fleury
>
> Assistant Professor | Office: B1-201
> Computer Science Department, | Phone: +45 96 35 72
> 23
> Aalborg University, | Mobile: +45 26 22 98
> 03
> Fredriks Bajersvej 7E, | E-mail:
> fleury@cs.aau.dk
> 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark | URL:
> www.cs.aau.dk/~fleury
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-05 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <431C3665.1090002@cs.aau.dk>
2005-09-05 14:50 ` Ahmad Reza Cheraghi [this message]
2005-09-05 8:42 Ahmad Reza Cheraghi
2005-09-05 9:23 ` Emmanuel Fleury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050905145030.90158.qmail@web51003.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=a_r_cheraghi@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®