From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: ncunningham@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:32:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603240132.35662.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060323155850.23f69591.akpm@osdl.org>
On Friday 24 March 2006 00:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > I guess I missed this one somehow. Using a bitmap for allocated swap is really
> > > inefficient because the values are usually not fragmented much. Extents would
> > > have been a far better choice.
> >
> > I agree it probably may be improved. Still it seems to be good enough. Further,
> > it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement.
> > Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to
> > behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.
>
> I think that temporarily allocating 1/32768th of total memory here is
> reasonable, especially as it's not all allocated in a contiguous hunk.
>
> > Currently I'm not working on any better solution. If you can provide any
> > patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be
> > tested for as long as this code, in -mm.
>
> I was a little saddened by the open-coded approach. I'd expect that both
> radix-trees and idr-trees could be used in this application. Probably the
> former. (Radix-trees should have been designed from day one to store
> `unsigned long's, not void*'s, so unless we change that, this application
> will need to use typecasts when converting between void*'s and the stored
> BITS_PER_LONG bitmaps).
Perhaps we can use radix-trees here. Frankly, I haven't investigated this
possibility yet, because this part is not very high on my priority list for
improvements. :-)
First, I'd like to get the userland suspend out so people can benefit from the
userland interface. Second, I think we can save much more memory if we
use bitmaps for the image metadata, but that will require a lot of work.
Then, there's the problem of the system responsiveness after resume,
and the "USB storage not available after resume" problem that I wouldn't
like to drop on the floor. Not to mention device driver problems.
Greetings,
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-24 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200603231702.k2NH2OSC006774@hera.kernel.org>
2006-03-23 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-23 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-23 22:48 ` Mark Lord
2006-03-23 23:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-27 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-27 10:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-27 23:15 ` regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code] Pavel Machek
2006-03-27 23:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 1:18 ` regular swsusp flamewar Harald Arnesen
2006-03-28 9:15 ` regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code] Pavel Machek
2006-03-28 9:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-28 10:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 1:16 ` regular swsusp flamewar Harald Arnesen
2006-03-28 9:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-23 23:58 ` [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code Andrew Morton
2006-03-24 0:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603240132.35662.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®