mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: ncunningham@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:32:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603240132.35662.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060323155850.23f69591.akpm@osdl.org>

On Friday 24 March 2006 00:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > I guess I missed this one somehow. Using a bitmap for allocated swap is really 
> > > inefficient because the values are usually not fragmented much. Extents would 
> > > have been a far better choice.
> > 
> > I agree it probably may be improved.  Still it seems to be good enough.  Further,
> > it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement.
> > Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to
> > behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.
> 
> I think that temporarily allocating 1/32768th of total memory here is
> reasonable, especially as it's not all allocated in a contiguous hunk.
> 
> > Currently I'm not working on any better solution.  If you can provide any
> > patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be
> > tested for as long as this code, in -mm.
> 
> I was a little saddened by the open-coded approach.  I'd expect that both
> radix-trees and idr-trees could be used in this application.  Probably the
> former.  (Radix-trees should have been designed from day one to store
> `unsigned long's, not void*'s, so unless we change that, this application
> will need to use typecasts when converting between void*'s and the stored
> BITS_PER_LONG bitmaps).

Perhaps we can use radix-trees here.  Frankly, I haven't investigated this
possibility yet, because this part is not very high on my priority list for
improvements. :-)

First, I'd like to get the userland suspend out so people can benefit from the
userland interface.  Second, I think we can save much more memory if we
use bitmaps for the image metadata, but that will require a lot of work.
Then, there's the problem of the system responsiveness after resume,
and the "USB storage not available after resume" problem that I wouldn't
like to drop on the floor.  Not to mention device driver problems.

Greetings,
Rafael

      reply	other threads:[~2006-03-24  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200603231702.k2NH2OSC006774@hera.kernel.org>
2006-03-23 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-23 21:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-23 22:48     ` Mark Lord
2006-03-23 23:39       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-27 10:26       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-27 10:43         ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-27 23:15           ` regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code] Pavel Machek
2006-03-27 23:36             ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28  1:18               ` regular swsusp flamewar Harald Arnesen
2006-03-28  9:15               ` regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code] Pavel Machek
2006-03-28  9:16               ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-28 10:28                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28  1:16             ` regular swsusp flamewar Harald Arnesen
2006-03-28  9:13               ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-23 23:58     ` [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code Andrew Morton
2006-03-24  0:32       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603240132.35662.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®