From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Document that sys_sysctl will be removed.
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:50:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060710155051.326e49da.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1psgdkrt8.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:39:47 -0600 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index e978943..bef1bf0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -250,3 +250,14 @@ Why: These drivers never compiled since
> Who: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>
> ---------------------------
> +
> +What: sys_sysctl
> +When: January 2007
> +Why: The same information is available through /proc/sys and that is the
> + interface user space prefers to use. And there do not appear to be
> + any existing user in user space of sys_sysctl. The additional
> + maintenance overhead of keeping a set of binary names gets
> + in the way of doing a good job of maintaining this interface.
> +
> +Who: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
aha, patch 1/2 and patch 2/2 would have helped that. :)
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 22:39 Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-10 22:50 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2006-07-11 4:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-11 7:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-12 16:25 ` [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-12 16:50 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-12 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-12 23:24 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-12 23:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-13 0:12 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-13 2:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-13 12:15 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 23:44 ` Steve Munroe
2006-07-14 18:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-14 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-13 0:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-12 18:44 ` Roland McGrath
2006-07-12 19:33 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-12 19:53 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-07-12 20:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-12 21:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-12 21:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-12 21:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-12 22:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-12 22:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-12 22:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-12 22:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-12 23:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-12 23:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-13 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-14 18:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-14 19:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-12 21:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-12 21:33 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-07-13 5:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-13 6:27 ` Ian Wienand
2006-07-13 14:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-13 15:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060710155051.326e49da.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®