From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752512AbZH1PTx (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:19:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751896AbZH1PTx (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:19:53 -0400 Received: from ru.mvista.com ([213.79.90.228]:21238 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354AbZH1PTw (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:19:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:19:53 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Hu Mingkai-B21284 Cc: Kumar Gala , Ben Dooks , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdhci-devel@lists.ossman.eu, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , Pierre Ossman , David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/85xx: Add eSDHC support for MPC8536DS boards Message-ID: <20090828151953.GA14776@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com References: <20090807195724.GA24020@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090807195822.GG2735@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090818233818.GA29042@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090819015101.GA10782@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C304438438@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C304438438@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 07:02:51PM +0800, Hu Mingkai-B21284 wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:24:17PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > > > > >This patch simply adds sdhci node to the device tree. > > > > > > > >We specify clock-frequency manually, so that eSDHC will > > work without > > > >upgrading U-Boot. Though, that'll only work for default setup (1500 > > > >MHz) on new board revisions. For non-default setups, it's > > recommended > > > >to upgrade U-Boot, since it will fixup clock-frequency > > automatically. > > > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov > > > > > > out of interest the 85xx eSDHC don't need the sdhci,wp-inverted > > > property? > > > > Yes, eSDHC controllers in MPC85xx report normal state in its > > registers. > > > > Hi Anton, > > The eSDHC controller in different silicon version on MPC8536 reports > different WP state in the register PRSSTAT: Thanks a million for the heads up! Yes, the manual I used ("MPC8536ERM Rev. 0 10/2008") doesn't mention that, but the newer manual that I just downloaded ("MPC8536ERM Rev. 1 05/2009") does. [...] > For silicon 1.0, the macro SDHCI_QUIRK_INVERTED_WRITE_PROTECT is also > defined, > so the dirver will report the error WP state in function sdhci_get_ro. Not any longer. We don't actually define it for any 85xx CPUs. I need to think how should we handle all these WP inversions. :-) So, we have inversion in BCSR (depending on the BCSR revision), configurable inversion in CPU via GENCFGR for 1.1 silicon, and non-configurable non-inverted reporting for 1.0 silicon... Do you know if there are any plans to fix the WP inversion for MPC8569E-MDS boards, or make something like GENCFGR for MPC8569 CPUs? Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2