From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Feng Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chien Yen <chien.yen@oracle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when driver load first time
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:40:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521134059.GE492@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519B474E.4000202@citrix.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2976 bytes --]
> Looking at the hypervisor code I couldn't see anything obviously wrong.
I think the culprit is "physdev_unmap_pirq":
if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
{
spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,"d%d, pirq: %d is %x %s, irq: %d\n",
d->domain_id, pirq, domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq),
domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq) == IRQ_UNBOUND ? "unbound" : "",
domain_pirq_to_irq(d, pirq));
if ( domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq) != IRQ_UNBOUND )
ret = unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq(d, pirq);
spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
if ( domid == DOMID_SELF || ret )
goto free_domain;
It always tells me unbound:
(XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 54 is ffffffff
(XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
(XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 53 is ffffffff
(XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
(XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 52 is ffffffff
(XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
(XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 51 is ffffffff
(XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
(XEN) physdev.c:237:d14 14, pirq: 50 is ffffffff
(XEN) irq.c:1873:d14 14, nr_pirqs: 56
(a bit older debug code, so the 'unbound' does not show up here).
Which means that the call to unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq does not happen.
The checks in unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq also look to be depend
on the code being IRQ_UNBOUND.
In other words, all of that code looks to only clear things when
they are !IRQ_UNBOUND.
But the other logic (IRQ_UNBOUND) looks to be missing a removal
in the radix tree:
if ( emuirq != IRQ_PT )
radix_tree_delete(&d->arch.hvm_domain.emuirq_pirq, emuirq);
And I think that is what is causing the leak - the radix tree
needs to be pruned? Or perhaps the allocate_pirq should check
the radix tree for IRQ_UNBOUND ones and re-use them?
> I do note that Xen doesn't free the pirq until it has been unbound by
> the guest. Xen will warn if the guest unmaps a pirq that is still bound
> ("domD: forcing unbind of pirq P"). Is this what is happening? If so,
No. It does not b/c of this check in physdev_unmap_pirq:
if ( domid == DOMID_SELF || ret )
goto free_domain
which jumps over the call to unmap_domain_pirq.
> that would suggest a bug in the guest rather than the hypervisor.
No. But then I am not even using it. See attached module.
>
> David
[-- Attachment #2: alloc_and_unmap.c --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1232 bytes --]
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <xen/xen.h>
#include <xen/page.h>
#include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
#include <xen/features.h>
#include <xen/events.h>
MODULE_AUTHOR("Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("alloc_and_unmap");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_VERSION("0.1");
static int do_it(void)
{
int rc;
struct physdev_get_free_pirq op_get_free_pirq;
struct physdev_unmap_pirq unmap_irq;
int pirq;
op_get_free_pirq.type = MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI;
rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_get_free_pirq, &op_get_free_pirq);
if (rc) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s:%d rc:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__, rc);
return rc;
}
pirq = op_get_free_pirq.pirq;
unmap_irq.pirq = pirq;
unmap_irq.domid = DOMID_SELF;
rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq, &unmap_irq);
if (rc) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "unmap irq failed %d\n", rc);
return rc;
}
printk("PIRQ: %d\n", pirq);
return 0;
}
static int __init alloc_and_unmap_init(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
if (do_it())
break;
return 0;
}
static void __exit alloc_and_unmap_exit(void)
{
}
module_init(alloc_and_unmap_init);
module_exit(alloc_and_unmap_exit);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-08 8:18 Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-10 18:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-13 7:44 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-13 11:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-13 14:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-13 14:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-13 16:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-13 17:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-13 18:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-14 13:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-14 14:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-15 9:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-15 14:18 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-17 2:22 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-20 10:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-20 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-20 17:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-20 20:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-21 10:07 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2013-05-21 13:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-05-21 16:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-21 20:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-21 21:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-21 22:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-22 9:37 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-22 15:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-22 15:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-22 16:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-23 6:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-29 17:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-30 17:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <51AECC3A.7060803@oracle.com>
2013-06-05 12:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 2:57 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-20 14:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-24 7:19 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-24 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 5:33 ` DuanZhenzhong
2013-06-25 17:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-26 4:00 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-26 18:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-27 4:01 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-27 11:52 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-28 2:33 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-28 11:12 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130521134059.GE492@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=chien.yen@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yuval.shaia@oracle.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®