From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhaomeijing@lixiang.com
Cc: robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: reserved_mem: only support one <base size> entry in reg property
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 16:24:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519082427.4181476-4-chenwandun@lixiang.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519082427.4181476-1-chenwandun@lixiang.com>
A /reserved-memory child node may have multiple <base size> tuples in
'reg' property, but multiple entries in 'reg' have never been fully
functional:
- fdt_scan_reserved_mem() in the early pass loops over every
tuple and reserves them all.
- fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late() reads 'reg' by
of_flat_dt_get_addr_size(), which returns false if entries != 1.
So 'reg' property with multiple <base size> entries will be
skipped, no reserved_mem entry is created in reserved_mem[].
Supporting multiple <base size> tuples is not a good idea:
- It requires reserved_mem_ops->node_init support. Currently,
CMA(rmem_cma_setup) and DMA(rmem_dma_setup) are not supported.
- of_reserved_mem_lookup() is name-based, only the first entry in
multiple <base size> tuples will be found.
So change to support one <base size> entry in 'reg' property.
Also update dt binding:
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/197
Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
Tested-by: Meijing Zhao <zhaomeijing@lixiang.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260506014752.GA280279-robh@kernel.org/
---
drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
index 462e7c3078a3..0e91c4a71d89 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
@@ -134,37 +134,38 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(unsigned long node,
const char *uname)
{
phys_addr_t base, size;
- int i, len, err;
+ int len, err;
const __be32 *prop;
bool nomap;
+ u64 b, s;
prop = of_flat_dt_get_addr_size_prop(node, "reg", &len);
if (!prop)
return -ENOENT;
+ if (len > 1)
+ pr_warn("Reserved memory: node '%s' has %d <base size> entries, only the first is used\n",
+ uname, len);
+
nomap = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "no-map", NULL) != NULL;
err = fdt_validate_reserved_mem_node(node, NULL);
if (err && err != -ENODEV)
return err;
- for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
- u64 b, s;
-
- of_flat_dt_read_addr_size(prop, i, &b, &s);
-
- base = b;
- size = s;
+ of_flat_dt_read_addr_size(prop, 0, &b, &s);
+ base = b;
+ size = s;
- if (size && early_init_dt_reserve_memory(base, size, nomap) == 0) {
- fdt_fixup_reserved_mem_node(node, base, size);
- pr_debug("Reserved memory: reserved region for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
- uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
- } else {
- pr_err("Reserved memory: failed to reserve memory for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
- uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
- }
+ if (size && early_init_dt_reserve_memory(base, size, nomap) == 0) {
+ fdt_fixup_reserved_mem_node(node, base, size);
+ pr_debug("Reserved memory: reserved region for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
+ uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
+ } else {
+ pr_err("Reserved memory: failed to reserve memory for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
+ uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
}
+
return 0;
}
@@ -277,20 +278,24 @@ void __init fdt_scan_reserved_mem_late(void)
alloc_reserved_mem_array();
fdt_for_each_subnode(child, fdt, node) {
+ const __be32 *prop;
const char *uname;
u64 b, s;
int ret;
+ int len;
if (!of_fdt_device_is_available(fdt, child))
continue;
- if (!of_flat_dt_get_addr_size(child, "reg", &b, &s))
+ prop = of_flat_dt_get_addr_size_prop(child, "reg", &len);
+ if (!prop)
continue;
ret = fdt_validate_reserved_mem_node(child, NULL);
if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
continue;
+ of_flat_dt_read_addr_size(prop, 0, &b, &s);
base = b;
size = s;
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 8:24 [PATCH v2 0/3] of: reserved_mem: fixes and cleanups Wandun Chen
2026-05-19 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] of: reserved_mem: avoid unnecessary memory allocation when __reserved_mem_check_root() fails Wandun Chen
2026-05-20 7:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-20 8:16 ` Wandun
2026-06-01 23:06 ` Rob Herring
2026-06-02 1:37 ` Wandun
2026-05-19 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] of: reserved_mem: clean up redundant alloc_reserved_mem_array() call Wandun Chen
2026-05-19 8:24 ` Wandun Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260519082427.4181476-4-chenwandun@lixiang.com \
--to=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=zhaomeijing@lixiang.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®