From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
david.laight.linux@gmail.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
ashok.bhat@arm.com, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 14:46:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521144629.11ee1e2ff88c5387a589f54a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521083038.134260-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
On Thu, 21 May 2026 01:30:37 -0700 Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> wrote:
> Add success and failure case tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout().
>
> All of the test cases wait on some state in smp_cond_load_*_timeout().
> In the success case we spawn a kthread that pokes the bit.
>
> Success or failure cases depend on the expected bit being set (or not).
> Additionally in failure cases smp_cond_load_*_timeout() cannot return
> before timeout.
Your title "kunit: ..." implies that this is a kunit patchset. ie, and
to my mind, this implies that the patchset makes changes to kunit
infrastructure. This isn't the case, of course.
>
> ...
>
> +config BARRIER_TIMEOUT_TEST
> + tristate "KUnit tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()"
The patchset which attempted to add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() was
titled "barrier: ...", which is a more appropriate identifier for this
patchset.
Anyway, I removed the series "barrier: Add
smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout()" from mm.git on May 19 for
forgotten reasons. So I suggest that the series be respun and resent,
with these two test patches included.
Again, I'm really not the guy to be handling these patches. But a 4-6%
performance improvement in real world workloads is not to be ignored.
Not by me, anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 12:25 [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-05-06 7:30 ` Ankur Arora
2026-05-06 8:58 ` David Laight
2026-05-06 20:54 ` Ankur Arora
2026-05-07 9:57 ` David Laight
2026-05-08 6:31 ` Ankur Arora
2026-05-08 8:32 ` David Laight
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-20 16:57 ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-20 17:50 ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-21 7:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-04-20 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] kunit: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-05-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v11 1/2] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-05-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v11 2/2] kunit: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-05-21 21:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-05-21 21:57 ` [PATCH v11 1/2] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Mark Brown
2026-05-22 5:10 ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-23 17:16 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-23 19:29 ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-24 14:16 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed, acquire}_timeout() Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-24 14:10 ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 18:10 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521144629.11ee1e2ff88c5387a589f54a@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®