From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rafael J Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: [PATCH v13 0/5] Simplify PCIe native ownership
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:26:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919162655.3499010-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> (raw)
This revives Bjorn's v12 from November 2020, rebased onto v7.3-rc3.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201126011816.711106-1-helgaas@kernel.org/
The goal is unchanged. Decide who owns each PCIe port service in one
place, when we interpret the _OSC results in acpi_pci_root_create(), so
that everywhere else only has to look at host_bridge->native_X. For AER
specifically, host_bridge->native_aer becomes the single answer to the
question "may Linux touch the AER Capability?". Today callers each have
to remember to also test pcie_ports_native and pci_aer_available().
I posted v11. Bjorn took it over at v12, split the _OSC changes in two
and deferred the "pcie_ports=dpc-native" work. The v12 review comments
were agreed but never respun, and the series stalled. v13 is that
respin. Each patch carries its own changelog.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1603766889.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
Bjorn suggested reviving it in response to Guixin Liu's report that
"pcie_ports=native" no longer enables DPC. The DPC service binds on
host_bridge->native_aer, and that flag did not reflect the command line,
so DPC stayed off when firmware retained AER control. Patch 4 fixes it
by making the flag reflect it.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20260901064554.2178688-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
Patch 4 has a side effect worth calling out. drivers/cxl/core/ras.c did
not exist in 2020 and tests host_bridge->native_aer with no
pcie_ports_native fallback, so it has been quietly ignoring
"pcie_ports=native". Centralizing the check fixes that.
Two things are left for later, to keep this series a cleanup.
* pci_aer_available() stays in the DPC arm of
get_port_device_capability(), because "pcie_ports=dpc-native" still
needs it there.
* We still gate the DPC service on native_aer and ignore
OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL, as Bjorn noted in the v12 cover letter.
Fixing it changes behavior, so it wants its own patch.
Bjorn Helgaas (2):
PCI/DPC: Ignore devices with no AER Capability
PCI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (3):
PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv
enabled
PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking
PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 3 --
drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 6 +--
drivers/pci/pcie/aer_cxl_rch.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 3 ++
drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c | 7 ++-
drivers/pci/probe.c | 8 ++--
9 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
base-commit: fd73f4a6659897191fa0d40695fe370925dd3780
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 16:26 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2026-09-19 16:26 ` [PATCH v13 1/5] PCI/DPC: Ignore devices with no AER Capability Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-20 6:11 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-21 16:43 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-21 19:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-19 16:26 ` [PATCH v13 2/5] PCI: Assume control of portdrv-related features only when portdrv enabled Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-20 6:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-09-21 18:59 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-21 19:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-09-22 17:30 ` Bowman, Terry
2026-09-19 16:26 ` [PATCH v13 3/5] PCI/ACPI: Tidy _OSC control bit checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 13:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-19 16:26 ` [PATCH v13 4/5] PCI/ACPI: Centralize pcie_ports_native checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-20 7:24 ` Guixin Liu
2026-09-21 20:41 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2026-09-22 13:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-19 16:26 ` [PATCH v13 5/5] PCI: Centralize pci_aer_available() checking Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-23 1:11 [PATCH v13 0/5] Simplify PCIe native ownership Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-03-18 20:16 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260919162655.3499010-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®