From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF7242048C; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 23:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790032304; cv=none; b=kjKhd9NgLfqeXxMkjL4/vVAFQIOX+d93aEWIVMiKeB+uh+wG19q6ry0GjB9V8HyLyifqEEFP7s546tDlzvEQF4w3LYXbxZHekw187UoAufa2r/oF5afgLC/NoyBvYHYmZMzALB44Ce+71P29KYlCDoubCSuXhP9zYoOz//gKwW0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790032304; c=relaxed/simple; bh=96F+HosCCV/QhQECXJqPfkaoiYQvQzr0Foq6mOXXfq0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Gkin1ZZBg/FE9Lt5YiQAFJFh5LGBUNNvg3kgy+vcJoDgGn3hH46lI1VVl+Uc4nNCro2DhI82gVGv3NAzMVemEff0Yt4JGDiUKatYK/vb6+x5GalBcyU3WFFxDqrIxRObZHimlxaAG0mAGgEfCGnL9jdp7WhRyNcKS/miWB34LQ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kcJe/lq0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kcJe/lq0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33BA31F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 23:11:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790032303; bh=Aygh3cExfS2xIR+EYNHvTANjJUnErDlfiV1qPT7MAQE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=kcJe/lq0nIr5/SAckf5kN38W5jFTvinz6UIdxG5UtQZkqLnt8MXilbTFY8wnBof5Y t4mA6Z+cblkxEffINUkgxyXKsmRt9qNSX9E8JIe3u2++3gAO/+AmlELNlMctKwgKGE FUxwLqd7coulFZpF2JfbsJdvhi1Up9p4iIXqEOvRnk0rhI8UDi3094pzJidfDKdf6O yBW/7Vm7xeCFvsYClBcofl78tZ4Zt4QsvmwAgO/FNYcXDIkLnpHSmb+MTSzJC2f0Z6 SgN7URJ2j7ipVDpe3gIKE6VPjuy2FTCfssDgGUJE4CmV45GGGrKPVdkqeEzJ1waWtN tvSQQqrRQLLuQ== Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:11:42 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Andrea Parri , John Stultz Cc: Tony Luck , "Guilherme G . Piccoli" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Colin Cross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pstore: reject persistent RAM zones too small for the buffer header Message-ID: <202609211608.CD32B1FDA@keescook> References: <20260921202317.70595-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com> <20260921202317.70595-3-parri.andrea@gmail.com> <202609211431.11176F76@keescook> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 12:38:24AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > (Dropped anton.vorontsov@linaro.org and john.stultz@linaro.org from Cc, > both bounced.) AFAICT, Anton isn't involved any more. But, hey John, you need a .mailmap entry. :) > > I wonder if it should return ENOSPC instead, though? > > Fair point: nothing branches on the specific errno, but ENOSPC matches > the "doesn't fit" convention used elsewhere in ram.c, while EINVAL is > otherwise reserved for malformed config values. I'll send a one-line > patch on top of 1b30df8662ac switching it, unless you'd rather fold it > in yourself. I'm happy to fold it in. Thank you! -Kees -- Kees Cook