From: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Jeff Hugo" <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
"Sidong Yang" <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai>,
"Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
"Jiaxing Hu" <gahing@gahingwoo.com>,
"Nicolas Dufresne" <nicolas@ndufresne.ca>,
"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
"Guangshuo Li" <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>,
"Hüseyin BIYIK" <boogiepop@gmx.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Igor Paunovic" <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] accel/rocket: search every core slot when a core is removed
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:01:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922080114.44662-2-royalnet026@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922080114.44662-1-royalnet026@gmail.com>
rocket_remove() decrements rdev->num_cores for each core it removes,
while find_core_for_dev() searches slots 0 to num_cores - 1. Unbinding
the cores in the order they were bound therefore loses the last one: by
the time it is removed the search range has already shrunk past its
slot, so find_core_for_dev() returns -1 and rocket_remove() gives up
without doing anything.
num_cores never reaches zero, rocket_device_fini() never runs, and the
file-scoped rdev keeps pointing at a device that is going away. Binding
the cores again starts from that stale count, because rocket_probe()
takes rdev->num_cores as the slot to fill. On an RK3588, which describes
three cores, the second round lands on slots 1, 2 and 3 while rdev->cores
was allocated with room for three:
rocket fdab0000.npu: Rockchip NPU core 1 version: 1179210309
rocket fdac0000.npu: Rockchip NPU core 2 version: 1179210309
rocket fdad0000.npu: Rockchip NPU core 3 version: 1179210309
The write to rdev->cores[3] is past the end of the array.
Nothing in tree reads the core array often enough to notice, so the
overrun is silent today. It turned up while testing a devfreq series on
top of this, where a worker walks every core a few times a second, and
UBSAN caught the first bool it read out of the overrun entry:
UBSAN: invalid-load in drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_devfreq.c:47:10
load of value 5 is not a valid value for type '_Bool'
Workqueue: devfreq_wq devfreq_monitor
Record how many slots were allocated and search all of them. Every core
is then found on removal, num_cores reaches zero, the device is torn down
and a later bind starts from a clean rdev.
This does not make unbinding a single core out of several work: probe
still takes num_cores as the slot to fill, and rocket_open() still
reaches for cores[0] whether or not anything is there. The fourth patch
takes care of both.
Found by unbinding and rebinding all three cores on an Orange Pi 5 Plus.
With this applied the cores land in slots 0, 1 and 2 every time, whichever
order they are bound in, and the shared supply goes back to a single user
after each round.
Fixes: ed98261b4168 ("accel/rocket: Add a new driver for Rockchip's NPU")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: LLM sparse checkpatch
Signed-off-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com> # RK3576, two cores
Tested-by: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai> # RK3588, 3 cores
---
Two paragraphs changed from the standalone posting, which this series
supersedes: the one on unbinding a single core now points at patch 4
instead of saying what is left, and the round counts are dropped from
the last one. Posting:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904125936.26234-1-royalnet026@gmail.com
The two Tested-by tags are from that thread. The round counts were
taken on a kernel that carried the use-after-free fixed in 8/11; they
were re-measured with the whole series applied, see the notes on patch
4 and the cover letter. The single-core unbind and rocket_open() cases
in that paragraph are 2/2 of the lifecycle series, now rebased into
this one as patch 4:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260731064933.12548-3-royalnet026@gmail.com
drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c | 2 ++
drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h | 1 +
drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
index 46e6ee1e72c5f..efd004194c1af 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ struct rocket_device *rocket_device_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (of_device_is_available(core_node))
num_cores++;
+ rdev->max_cores = num_cores;
+
rdev->cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_cores, sizeof(*rdev->cores), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rdev->cores)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
index ce662abc01d3d..c62d567010696 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
+++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct rocket_device {
struct rocket_core *cores;
unsigned int num_cores;
+ unsigned int max_cores;
};
struct rocket_device *rocket_device_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
index 8bbbce594883e..2bcfe4ab3c68f 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int find_core_for_dev(struct device *dev)
{
struct rocket_device *rdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- for (unsigned int core = 0; core < rdev->num_cores; core++) {
+ for (unsigned int core = 0; core < rdev->max_cores; core++) {
if (dev == rdev->cores[core].dev)
return core;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 8:01 [PATCH v2 00/11] accel/rocket: DVFS for the RK3588 NPU Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` Igor Paunovic [this message]
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] accel/rocket: number the cores by devicetree position, not bind order Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] accel/rocket: search every core slot when looking up a scheduler Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] accel/rocket: keep core slots stable across unbind and rebind Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: allow DVFS and thermal properties Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 16:06 ` Rob Herring
2026-09-23 8:57 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-23 9:15 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-09-23 9:43 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588: add an OPP table for the NPU Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] accel/rocket: restore the NPU clock boot rate before powering the cores down Igor Paunovic
[not found] ` <20260922081326.B46651F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-22 8:55 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] accel/rocket: add devfreq support Igor Paunovic
[not found] ` <20260922081855.160451F00893@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-22 8:56 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-23 13:14 ` Sidong Yang
2026-09-23 14:26 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] accel/rocket: register a devfreq cooling device Igor Paunovic
2026-09-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588: add passive cooling to the NPU thermal zone Igor Paunovic
2026-09-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] accel/rocket: DVFS for the RK3588 NPU Nicolas Dufresne
2026-09-23 19:54 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-24 5:37 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2026-09-24 7:36 ` Igor Paunovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922080114.44662-2-royalnet026@gmail.com \
--to=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=boogiepop@gmx.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas@ndufresne.ca \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®