From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: david@ixit.cz, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfc: nci: ignore unexpected CORE_RESET_NTF
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:07:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922080739.35915-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921125805.224979-1-horms@kernel.org>
Hi Simon,
Thank you (and the sashiko reviewer) for the thorough review.
The points raised are completely valid and insightful.
1. Regarding FDP firmware update breakage (Severity: High):
You are absolutely right. In nci_ntf_packet(), returning -EINVAL from
nci_core_reset_ntf_packet() aborts the dispatch pipeline (goto end), which
prevents nci_core_ntf_packet() from running driver-specific handlers. In
drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c, the firmware patching path relies on this spontaneous
CORE_RESET_NTF to wake up info->setup_wq; dropping the packet causes it to
block indefinitely.
As suggested, in v2 we drop only the core-level bookkeeping (skipping the
ndev->nci_ver update and nci_req_complete) and return 0 so that driver-registered
ops continue to receive the notification.
2. Regarding ntf->reset_trigger (Severity: Medium):
The reset_trigger field is revision-dependent: in NCI 1.0, CORE_RESET_CMD
is reported as 0x00 (0x01 is powered-on), while NCI 2.0 defines 0x00 as
an unrecoverable error and reports CORE_RESET_CMD as 0x02. Hardcoding
either value would break the other generation of devices, so v2 gates
the core bookkeeping on NCI_RESET_PENDING alone and only skips power-on
notifications (trigger 0x01, which means the same in both revisions).
Power-on notifications never overlap a pending reset in the protocol
flow, and both revision's command-triggered values reach the flag gate.
3. Regarding nci_core_reset_rsp_packet() (Severity: Medium):
Agreed. nci_core_reset_rsp_packet() now checks whether NCI_RESET_PENDING
is set before calling nci_req_complete() on non-OK or NCI 1.x responses to avoid
prematurely completing an unrelated request.
4. Regarding NCI 1.x response length check (Severity: Low):
In v2, we explicitly check skb->len >= sizeof(*rsp) to ensure config_status is
not read out-of-bounds in pr_debug().
5. Regarding request serialization / stale notifications (Severity: Medium):
All requests are serialized under ndev->req_lock, and __nci_request() unconditionally
clears NCI_RESET_PENDING before dropping req_lock. Filtering out power-on notifications
(trigger 0x01) ensures spontaneous controller power-ups are ignored, while checking and
clearing the pending flag ensures each command matches at most one notification.
6. Regarding request generation (Severity: Medium on both questions):
The NCI protocol gives notifications no request correlation, so a stale
CORE_RESET_NTF/RSP that is already inside nci_rx_work when a reset times
out and userspace retries cannot be distinguished from the new attempt's
own frame: the flag gate and the trigger check narrow the window, but a
generation identity would require protocol support that does not exist.
The failure path purges queued frames; only an in-flight worker frame can
straddle, and the data it carries originates from the same controller.
If you would prefer, I can add a per-request generation check for the RSP
path where an identity exists, as a follow-up.
v2 patch has been sent as reply to this thread.
Thanks,
Yuchao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 1:33 [PATCH 0/1] " zjamg
2026-09-18 1:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zjamg
2026-09-21 12:58 ` Simon Horman
2026-09-22 8:07 ` Yuchao Zhang [this message]
2026-09-22 8:07 ` [PATCH v2] nfc: nci: ignore unexpected CORE_RESET_NTF and CORE_RESET_RSP Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 10:05 ` David Heidelberg
2026-09-22 10:18 ` Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-25 11:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922080739.35915-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--to=ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®