From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com,
changwoo@igalia.com, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Cc: qyousef@layalina.io, christian.loehle@arm.com,
pierre.gondois@arm.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/18 v2] sched/fair: Prepare select_task_rq_fair() to be called for new cases
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 17:44:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002154415.2270586-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002154415.2270586-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Update select_task_rq_fair() to be called out of the 3 current cases which
are :
- wake up
- exec
- fork
We wants to select a rq in some new cases like pushing a runnable task on a
better CPU than the local one. In such case, it's not a wakeup , nor an
exec nor a fork. We make sure to not distrub these cases but still
go through EAS and fast-path.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f38cf5a37a8a..837dc74c9a8d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
}
/*
- * The caller (fork, wakeup) owns p->pi_lock, ->cpus_ptr is stable.
+ * The caller (fork, wakeup, push) owns p->pi_lock, ->cpus_ptr is stable.
*/
static inline
int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int *wake_flags)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 19a0e67827f7..f12678850ce2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9800,46 +9800,55 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
}
/*
- * select_task_rq_fair: Select target runqueue for the waking task in domains
- * that have the relevant SD flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_WAKE,
- * SD_BALANCE_FORK, or SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
+ * select_task_rq_fair: Select a target runqueue for the task.
+ * There are 2 ways to select the target runqueue:
+ * - The fast path which only looks for an idle CPU in the LLC or the smallest
+ * asymmetric domain (i.e. the lowest domain with all compute capacities).
+ * - The slow path which looks for the idlest CPU in the highest domain with
+ * the relevant SD flag set.
*
- * Balances load by selecting the idlest CPU in the idlest group, or under
- * certain conditions an idle sibling CPU if the domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE set.
+ * In practice, WF_EXEC and WF_FORK uses the slow path whereas WF_TTWU and no
+ * flag (Push) uses the fast path.
*
- * Returns the target CPU number.
*/
static int
-select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
+select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int select_flags)
{
- int sync = (wake_flags & WF_SYNC) && !(current->flags & PF_EXITING);
+ int sync = (select_flags & WF_SYNC) && !(current->flags & PF_EXITING);
+ int want_sibling = !(select_flags & (WF_EXEC | WF_FORK));
+ int new_cpu, cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct sched_domain *tmp, *sd = NULL;
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- int new_cpu = prev_cpu;
- int want_affine = 0;
/* SD_flags and WF_flags share the first nibble */
- int sd_flag = wake_flags & 0xF;
+ int sd_flag = select_flags & 0xF;
+ int want_affine = 0;
/*
- * required for stable ->cpus_allowed
+ * Required for stable ->cpus_allowed
*/
lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
- if (wake_flags & WF_TTWU) {
+
+ if (select_flags & WF_TTWU) {
record_wakee(p);
- if ((wake_flags & WF_CURRENT_CPU) &&
+ if ((select_flags & WF_CURRENT_CPU) &&
cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
return cpu;
+ }
- if (!is_rd_overutilized(this_rq()->rd)) {
- new_cpu = find_energy_efficient_cpu(p, prev_cpu);
- if (new_cpu >= 0)
- return new_cpu;
- new_cpu = prev_cpu;
- }
+ /*
+ * We don't want EAS to be called for exec or fork but it should be
+ * called for any other case such as wake up or push callback.
+ */
+ if (!is_rd_overutilized(this_rq()->rd) && want_sibling) {
+ new_cpu = find_energy_efficient_cpu(p, prev_cpu);
+ if (new_cpu >= 0)
+ return new_cpu;
+ }
+ if (select_flags & WF_TTWU)
want_affine = !wake_wide(p) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr);
- }
+
+ new_cpu = prev_cpu;
for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
/*
@@ -9871,8 +9880,8 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
return sched_balance_find_dst_cpu(sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sd_flag);
/* Fast path */
- if (wake_flags & WF_TTWU)
- return select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
+ if (want_sibling)
+ new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
return new_cpu;
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 15:43 [PATCH 00/18 v2] Improving latency of short slice tasks Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:43 ` [PATCH 01/18 v2] sched/eevdf: Decay positive lag of sleeping entities Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:43 ` [PATCH 02/18] sched/eevdf: Reset lag when waking up on idle cpu Vincent Guittot
2026-10-04 17:30 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 03/18 v2] sched/eevdf: Add per cpu cached min_slice Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 04/18 v2] sched/eevdf: Compare min slice during wake_affine Vincent Guittot
2026-10-05 15:58 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 05/18 v2] sched/eevdf: Add min slice check when selecting CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-10-04 19:18 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-02 15:44 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2026-10-06 22:25 ` [PATCH 06/18 v2] sched/fair: Prepare select_task_rq_fair() to be called for new cases Tim Chen
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 07/18] sched/fair: Add push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 08/18] sched/fair: Optimize " Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 09/18 v2] sched/core: Add rq flag to tick parameters Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 10/18 v2] sched/fair: Add force push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-10-06 19:24 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 11/18 v2] sched/fair: Support not wakeup case in select_idle_sibling Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 12/18 v2] sched/eevdf: Try to push short slice task on a better CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 13/18 v2] sched/eevdf: Push short slice task that are not picked Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 14/18 v2] sched/fair: Enable push task for preempt short Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 15/18 v2] energy model: Add a get previous state function Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 16/18 v2] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 17/18 v2] energy model: Remove unused em_cpu_energy() Vincent Guittot
2026-10-02 15:44 ` [PATCH 18/18 v2] sched/fair: Take into account slice in EAS Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002154415.2270586-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®