From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] devlink: fix devlink_rel reference leak when notify work is pending
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:59:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006145912.GI83879@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001042232.222987-1-yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 12:22:32PM +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work_schedule() takes a reference on the
> devlink_rel for the notify work and then queues the work, ignoring the
> return value of schedule_delayed_work(). If the work is already pending,
> nothing new is queued, the work runs only once and drops only one
> reference, so the extra one is leaked together with the devlink_rel and
> its index in devlink_rels.
>
> This is easy to hit. devl_register() of a nested instance queues the
> work, and if the instance is unregistered before the work has run,
> devlink_rel_put() queues it again while it is still pending. The work
> also keeps rescheduling itself for as long as the parent devlink lock
> cannot be taken, which widens the window. Registering and unregistering
> a nested devlink instance 100 times while holding the parent lock leaks
> all 100 devlink_rel objects.
>
> The reschedule path in devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work() has the same
> problem: if the work was queued again while it was running, the
> reference it holds is never dropped.
>
> Drop the reference in both places when the work was already pending.
> The pending work holds its own reference, so this can not be the last
> one.
>
> Fixes: c137743bce02 ("devlink: introduce object and nested devlink relationship infra")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 4:22 Haishuang Yan
2026-10-06 14:59 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-10-07 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006145912.GI83879@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®