From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
"Tushar Dave" <tdave@nvidia.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex@shazbot.org>,
"Ankit Agrawal" <ankita@nvidia.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 09:32:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261007063227.GC7822@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006204947.GA708098@bhelgaas>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 03:49:47PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 02:55:10PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > pci_bridge_has_acs_redir() treats Request and Completion Redirect as
> > interchangeable. On asymmetric fabrics, a control for only the reverse TLP
> > direction can unnecessarily force P2PDMA through the host bridge.
>
> Does "the reverse TLP direction" refer to Completions?
In general, the P2P code treats TLPs flowing from device A to device B the
same as TLPs flowing from device B to device A.
However, in the context of this commit message, yes: completions flow in the
opposite direction from the device's perspective.
>
> > Evaluate Request Redirect for client Requests and Completion Redirect for
> > provider read Completions. Continue treating enabled Egress Control
> > conservatively as a Request redirect.
>
> Completion Redirect is intended to avoid ordering rule violations
> between Completions and Requests when Requests are redirected (PCIe
> r7.0, sec 6.12.1.1). I assume this patch preserves the ordering rule,
> but does the commit log need to say something about that? I don't
> know enough about P2P DMA for it to be obvious to me.
I don't think so, i didn't change anything related to ordering.
>
> Not really a question for this series, but p2pdma.c and p2pdma.rst
> refer to "clients" and "providers", neither of which are mentioned in
> the PCIe spec. In this case it sounds like a client is a Requester
> and a provider is a Completer in spec terms. Is that always the case?
> If so, "client" and "provider" in this paragraph are not adding any
> information.
>
> If "client" is not the same concept as "Requester" and "provider" not
> the same as "Completer", maybe p2pdma.rst could explain the
> difference?
Client vs. provider are actual target vs. initiator. They express the
device role in the flow.
Thanks
>
> > Fixes: 52916982af48 ("PCI/P2PDMA: Support peer-to-peer memory")
> > Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> > Tested-by: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> > index 4e4d2df17a45..12612b82d80d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> > #include <linux/seq_buf.h>
> > #include <linux/xarray.h>
> >
> > +#include "pci.h"
> > +
> > struct pci_p2pdma {
> > struct gen_pool *pool;
> > bool p2pmem_published;
> > @@ -490,26 +492,56 @@ static struct pci_dev *find_parent_pci_dev(struct device *dev)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +enum pci_acs_p2pdma_state {
> > + PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_DIRECT,
> > + PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT,
> > +};
> > +
> > /*
> > - * Check if a PCI bridge has its ACS redirection bits set to redirect P2P
> > - * TLPs upstream via ACS. Returns 1 if the packets will be redirected
> > - * upstream, 0 otherwise.
> > + * Decide how a peer-to-peer Request at an ACS-capable ingress port routes,
> > + * from that port's ACS Control register.
> > + *
> > + * Linux does not read the Egress Control Vector, so Egress Control is treated
> > + * conservatively as a redirect. Per PCIe r7.0 Table 6-11 the outcomes it
> > + * selects are a direct route and an ACS Violation, and neither one lets peer
> > + * bus addressing be assumed.
> > */
> > -static int pci_bridge_has_acs_redir(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +static enum pci_acs_p2pdma_state
> > +pci_acs_p2pdma_request(u16 ctrl)
> > {
> > - int pos;
> > - u16 ctrl;
> > + return ctrl & (PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_EC) ?
> > + PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT : PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_DIRECT;
> > +}
> >
> > - pos = pdev->acs_cap;
> > - if (!pos)
> > - return 0;
> > +/*
> > + * Decide how a peer-to-peer Completion at an ACS-capable ingress port routes.
> > + * PCIe r7.0 sec 6.12.1.1: no ACS control other than P2P Completion Redirect
> > + * affects a Completion.
> > + */
> > +static enum pci_acs_p2pdma_state
> > +pci_acs_p2pdma_completion(u16 ctrl)
> > +{
> > + return ctrl & PCI_ACS_CR ? PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT :
> > + PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_DIRECT;
> > +}
> >
> > - pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +/*
> > + * Read @pdev's ACS Control register. A device without an ACS capability has
> > + * no peer-to-peer controls at all, which routes the same as having them all
> > + * clear. Returns false when the register is present but cannot be read; @ctrl
> > + * is then meaningless.
> > + */
> > +static bool pci_acs_p2pdma_ctrl(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 *ctrl)
> > +{
> > + int pos;
> >
> > - if (ctrl & (PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_EC))
> > - return 1;
> > + pos = pdev->acs_cap;
> > + if (!pos) {
> > + *ctrl = 0;
> > + return true;
> > + }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return !pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, ctrl);
> > }
> >
> > static void seq_buf_print_bus_devfn(struct seq_buf *buf, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > @@ -698,6 +730,10 @@ static unsigned long map_types_idx(struct pci_dev *client)
> > * then to Device B. The mapping type returned depends on the ACS
> > * redirection setting of the ports along the path.
> > *
> > + * The client initiates Requests to provider memory. Check Request Redirect
> > + * on the client path and Completion Redirect for read Completions on the
> > + * provider path.
> > + *
> > * If ACS redirect is set on any port in the path, traffic between the
> > * devices will go through the host bridge, so return
> > * PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE; otherwise return
> > @@ -721,6 +757,7 @@ calc_map_type_and_dist(struct pci_dev *provider, struct pci_dev *client,
> > int dist_a = 0;
> > int dist_b = 0;
> > char buf[128];
> > + u16 ctrl;
> >
> > seq_buf_init(&acs_list, buf, sizeof(buf));
> >
> > @@ -732,7 +769,9 @@ calc_map_type_and_dist(struct pci_dev *provider, struct pci_dev *client,
> > while (a) {
> > dist_b = 0;
> >
> > - if (pci_bridge_has_acs_redir(a)) {
> > + if (!pci_acs_p2pdma_ctrl(a, &ctrl) ||
> > + pci_acs_p2pdma_completion(ctrl) ==
> > + PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT) {
> > seq_buf_print_bus_devfn(&acs_list, a);
> > acs_cnt++;
> > }
> > @@ -761,7 +800,9 @@ calc_map_type_and_dist(struct pci_dev *provider, struct pci_dev *client,
> > if (a == bb)
> > break;
> >
> > - if (pci_bridge_has_acs_redir(bb)) {
> > + if (!pci_acs_p2pdma_ctrl(bb, &ctrl) ||
> > + pci_acs_p2pdma_request(ctrl) ==
> > + PCI_ACS_P2PDMA_REDIRECT) {
> > seq_buf_print_bus_devfn(&acs_list, bb);
> > acs_cnt++;
> > }
> > @@ -1109,10 +1150,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pmem_publish);
> > /**
> > * pci_p2pdma_map_type - Determine the mapping type for P2PDMA transfers
> > * @provider: P2PDMA provider structure
> > - * @dev: Target device for the transfer
> > + * @dev: Client device that initiates the transfer
> > *
> > * Determines how peer-to-peer DMA transfers should be mapped between
> > - * the provider and the target device. The mapping type indicates whether
> > + * the provider and the client device. The mapping type indicates whether
> > * the transfer can be done directly through PCI switches or must go
> > * through the host bridge.
> > */
> >
> > --
> > 2.55.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 11:55 [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 20:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 6:32 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of " Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 19:29 ` [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-06 21:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 6:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261007063227.GC7822@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®