From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace bio queueing trial only when it occurs
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:24:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360909072124q2fdb8d64g88144e0898801ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090908041345.GA16315@localhost>
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Wu Fengguang<fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:10:55PM +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Li Zefan<lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > Wu Fengguang wrote:
>> >> Minchan,
>> >>
>> >> I tend to agree with the change, but somehow confused by blkparse(1):
>> >>
>> >> Q -- queued This notes *intent* to queue i/o at the given location. No real requests exists yet.
>> >>
>> >> Li Zefan has been working on blktrace and he can tell more.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I work on ftrace-plugin blktrace and blk TRACE_EVENT, but don't know
>> > much about the old blktrace history. ;)
>> >
>> > I think the manpage says it's called before ->make_request_fn(), so
>> > "No real requests exist yet".
>> >
>> > Actually the trace was called just before make_request at first:
>> > 2056a782f8e7e65fd4bfd027506b4ce1c5e9ccd4
>> >
>> > And then 2 patches added some checks between them:
>> > 5ddfe9691c91a244e8d1be597b6428fcefd58103
>> > 51fd77bd9f512ab6cc9df0733ba1caaab89eb957
>> >
>> > It seems to me it makes sense to have this patch.
>>
>> Thanks for good information.
>> Yes. It seems above 2 patches seem to break the rule.
>> Could I add your ACK?
>
> Sure, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Thanks for careful review, Wu.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 0:34 Minchan Kim
2009-09-08 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-08 2:02 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-08 4:10 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-08 4:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-08 4:24 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-09-08 10:50 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-07 2:15 Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262360909072124q2fdb8d64g88144e0898801ad@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®