> When device_register() fails, kfree(devfreq) is called already in > devfreq_dev_release(), hence there is no need to call kfree(devfreq) > in err_dev again. > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang Thank you for pointing out that put_device() will eventually call kfree anyway. Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham Cheers, MyungJoo > --- > drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c > index 3927ed9..9b352da 100644 > --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c > @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, > if (err) { > put_device(&devfreq->dev); > mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); > - goto err_dev; > + goto err_out; > } > > mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); > @@ -518,7 +518,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, > err_init: > list_del(&devfreq->node); > device_unregister(&devfreq->dev); > -err_dev: > kfree(devfreq); > err_out: > return ERR_PTR(err); > -- > 2.5.0 ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«�éÿŠ{ayºʇڙë,j­¢f£¢·hš�ï�êÿ‘êçz_è®(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"�ú¶m§ÿÿ¾«þG«�éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~�á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿÿà ÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥