From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"jeremy@goop.org" <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: allow sections that are recycled to set _PAGE_RW
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:12:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B778628.30206@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266091697.2677.64.camel@sbs-t61>
On 02/13/2010 12:08 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> Checks in static_protections() ensure that we map the text mapping as
> read-only (and don't bother about what permissions it uses for
> underlying free pages that get freed in free_init_pages()). But the
> kernel direct mappings for free pages will be RW and ensure that the
> free pages can be read/written using the direct mapping.
>
> The checks in static_protections() for kernel text mapping ensure that
> we don't break the 2MB kernel text pages unnecessarily on 64bit kernels
> (as it has performance implications). We should be fine as long as the
> kernel identity mappings reflect the correct RW permissions.
>
> But somehow this is working fine on native kernels but not on Xen pv
> guest. Your patch will cause the performance issues that we are
> addressing using the static protections checks. I will look at this more
> detailed on tuesday.
>
Xen doesn't support PSE, so it has the (otherwise impossible)
combination of PAE and !PSE ... i.e. it only uses 4K pages.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-14 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-13 3:15 [PATCH] fix BUG: unable to handle kernel .. in free_init_pages called from mark_rodata_ro Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-13 3:15 ` [PATCH] x86_64: allow sections that are recycled to set _PAGE_RW Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-13 20:08 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-14 5:12 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-02-16 22:13 ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-18 19:51 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-22 23:48 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86_64, cpa: Don't work hard in preserving kernel 2M mappings when using 4K already tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B778628.30206@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®