On 01/18/2015 08:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> @@ -72,8 +72,10 @@ static void rts5249_fetch_vendor_settings(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr) >> > rtsx_pci_read_config_dword(pcr, PCR_SETTING_REG1, ®); >> > dev_dbg(&(pcr->pci->dev), "Cfg 0x%x: 0x%x\n", PCR_SETTING_REG1, reg); >> > >> >- if (!rtsx_vendor_setting_valid(reg)) >> >+ if (!rtsx_vendor_setting_valid(reg)) { >> >+ pcr_dbg(pcr, "skip fetch vendor setting\n"); >> > return; >> >+ } > This doesn't have anything to do with adding the new chip. > > And I'm not sure it's even required. > Yes, it can be removed, but it is useful for debug, help us to know whether config is load from hardware.ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«�éÿŠ{ayºʇڙë,j­¢f£¢·hš�ï�êÿ‘êçz_è®(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"�ú¶m§ÿÿ¾«þG«�éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~�á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿÿà ÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥