From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:14:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564fd92f-04b5-d28c-03a3-59d11ab4c6cd@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180910155329.GB20286@zn.tnic>
On 09/10/2018 10:53 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:15:38AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>> Now, the real question from all this SNAFU is, why can't all those point
>>> to a single struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info and all CPUs read a single
>>> thing? Why do they have to be per-CPU and thus waste so much memory?
>
> You forgot to answer to the real question - why do we need those things
> to be perCPU and why can't we use a single instance to share with *all*
> CPUs?
>
> Because if we can, then we're golden!
>
I did not forgot to answer it. Maybe Paolo or someone more knowledgeable
in that area of code can comment why those are perCpu.
-Brijesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 17:57 [PATCH v6 0/5] x86: Fix SEV guest regression Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/mm: Restructure sme_encrypt_kernel() Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/mm: fix sme_populate_pgd() to update page flags Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:28 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/mm: add .data..decrypted section to hold shared variables Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 11:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:33 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/kvm: use __decrypted attribute in " Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 13:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 13:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 15:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-10 12:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 12:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-07 17:57 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 13:15 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 13:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 15:10 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 15:30 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-10 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 10:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 11:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-11 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-11 14:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-10 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-10 16:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-10 16:14 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2018-09-10 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564fd92f-04b5-d28c-03a3-59d11ab4c6cd@amd.com \
--to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®