From: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>
To: david@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
baohua@kernel.org, bruzzhang@tencent.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
kasong@tencent.com, liam@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ljs@kernel.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
rppt@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, surenb@google.com,
vbabka@kernel.org, weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
zippermonkey@icloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:11:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57110a3c-8c09-4f13-b6fa-903155af2a74@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ea1abc4-ff2c-4070-8bfa-67f6892aaca7@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 02:47:36PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Two tabs. But this is starting to look a bit messy. Could a helper
> struct be used to reduce the parameter count to something readable?
Yeah, 7 args is too many. For v5 I'll bundle the plumbing into a
small struct.
> That looks rather hacky. You reinit the batch to then traverse the
> batch? There must be a cleaner way.
It works because reinit only zeros ->nr and ->i, the folios[] array
stays intact — saved count lets you walk it while folio_batch_add()
rebuilds. But I agree it's too subtle. Maybe I will use a local temp
array insteand.
> Took me a second to understand why exactly you test for these
> properties. Can you add a comment how these check here mimic what
> we checked earlier, before dropping the lock?
Will do. The three checks correspond to what shrink_folio_list() did
before the unlock: writeback may have started, swapin may have
remapped the folio, a GUP may have pinned it. Anything that fails
goes back via ret_folios.
> So, IIUC, what could have happened after dropping the folio lock is
> that someone would have remapped the folio to user space?
>
> Either from the pagecache or from the swap PTE -> swapcache.
>
> From there, it could have gotten pinned through the page tables.
>
> Is that correct?
Yes, exactly. A swapin (or a page cache lookup for file-backed)
can find the folio while it's unlocked, remap it into some process's
page tables, and from there a GUP — O_DIRECT, vmsplice, RDMA, etc. —
can pin it. That's precisely why pageout_batch() rechecks mapped
and dma_pinned before doing the TLB flush and writeout. Any folio
that got remapped or pinned in the window goes back via ret_folios
instead.
> What would happen if page migration finds the folio, locks it and
> wants to migrate it?
Migration can't find it. The folio is off the LRU (isolated) and
out of page tables (unmapped) — migration's two entry points.
Compaction walks PFNs but skips !PageLRU pages.NUMA hinting faults
walk page tables and won't find a folio with no PTEs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-28 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 14:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/vmscan: introduce folio_activate_locked() helper Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 11:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-28 16:09 ` Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() from shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 12:24 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-28 16:09 ` Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() " Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 12:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-28 16:10 ` Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-28 16:10 ` Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-28 16:11 ` Zhang Peng [this message]
2026-05-25 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57110a3c-8c09-4f13-b6fa-903155af2a74@icloud.com \
--to=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®