From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Document the fact that syscalls 512-547 are a legacy mistake
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 19:51:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c56fb4ddd18fc60a238eb4d867e4b3d97c6351e.1602471055.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
Since commit 6365b842aae4 ("x86/syscalls: Split the x32 syscalls
into their own table"), there is no need for special x32-specific
syscall numbers. I forgot to update the comments in syscall_64.tbl.
Add comments to make it clear to future contributors that this range
is a legacy wart.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
index f30d6ae9a688..4adb5d2a3319 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
@@ -363,10 +363,10 @@
439 common faccessat2 sys_faccessat2
#
-# x32-specific system call numbers start at 512 to avoid cache impact
-# for native 64-bit operation. The __x32_compat_sys stubs are created
-# on-the-fly for compat_sys_*() compatibility system calls if X86_X32
-# is defined.
+# Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently
+# in x32 as compared to native x86_64. These syscalls have numbers 512-547.
+# Do not add new syscalls to this range. Numbers 548 and above are available
+# for non-x32 use.
#
512 x32 rt_sigaction compat_sys_rt_sigaction
513 x32 rt_sigreturn compat_sys_x32_rt_sigreturn
@@ -404,3 +404,5 @@
545 x32 execveat compat_sys_execveat
546 x32 preadv2 compat_sys_preadv64v2
547 x32 pwritev2 compat_sys_pwritev64v2
+# This is the end of the legacy x32 range. Numbers 548 and above are
+# not special and are not to be used for x32-specific syscalls.
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 2:51 Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-10-14 17:58 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c56fb4ddd18fc60a238eb4d867e4b3d97c6351e.1602471055.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=jrtc27@jrtc27.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®