From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ahmed.abdelsalam@gssi.it, david.lebrun@uclouvain.be,
dav.lebrun@gmail.com, andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it,
paolo.lungaroni@cnit.it
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/2] Perform IPv4 FIB lookup in a predefined FIB table
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:06:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7302c1f7-b6d1-90b7-5df1-3e5e0ba98f53@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213010932.11817-2-carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
On 2/12/20 6:09 PM, Carmine Scarpitta wrote:
> In IPv4, the routing subsystem is invoked by calling ip_route_input_rcu()
> which performs the recognition logic and calls ip_route_input_slow().
>
> ip_route_input_slow() initialises both "fi" and "table" members
> of the fib_result structure to null before calling fib_lookup().
>
> fib_lookup() performs fib lookup in the routing table configured
> by the policy routing rules.
>
> In this patch, we allow invoking the ip4 routing subsystem
> with known routing table. This is useful for use-cases implementing
> a separate routing table per tenant.
>
> The patch introduces a new flag named "tbl_known" to the definition of
> ip_route_input_rcu() and ip_route_input_slow().
>
> When the flag is set, ip_route_input_slow() will call fib_table_lookup()
> using the defined table instead of using fib_lookup().
I do not like this change. If you want a specific table lookup, then why
just call fib_table_lookup directly? Both it and rt_dst_alloc are
exported for modules. Your next patch already does a fib table lookup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
> Acked-by: Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahmed.abdelsalam@gssi.it>
> Acked-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
> Acked-by: Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@cnit.it>
> ---
> include/net/route.h | 2 +-
> net/ipv4/route.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
> index a9c60fc68e36..4ff977bd7029 100644
> --- a/include/net/route.h
> +++ b/include/net/route.h
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ int ip_route_input_noref(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 dst, __be32 src,
> u8 tos, struct net_device *devin);
> int ip_route_input_rcu(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 dst, __be32 src,
> u8 tos, struct net_device *devin,
> - struct fib_result *res);
> + struct fib_result *res, bool tbl_known);
>
> int ip_route_use_hint(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 dst, __be32 src,
> u8 tos, struct net_device *devin,
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index d5c57b3f77d5..39cec9883d6f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ int ip_route_use_hint(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
>
> static int ip_route_input_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
> u8 tos, struct net_device *dev,
> - struct fib_result *res)
> + struct fib_result *res, bool tbl_known)
> {
> struct in_device *in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
> struct flow_keys *flkeys = NULL, _flkeys;
> @@ -2109,8 +2109,6 @@ static int ip_route_input_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
> if (ipv4_is_multicast(saddr) || ipv4_is_lbcast(saddr))
> goto martian_source;
>
> - res->fi = NULL;
> - res->table = NULL;
> if (ipv4_is_lbcast(daddr) || (saddr == 0 && daddr == 0))
> goto brd_input;
I believe this also introduces a potential bug. You remove the fi
initialization yet do not cover the goto case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-15 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 1:09 [net-next 0/2] Add support for SRv6 End.DT4 action Carmine Scarpitta
2020-02-13 1:09 ` [net-next 1/2] Perform IPv4 FIB lookup in a predefined FIB table Carmine Scarpitta
2020-02-15 18:06 ` David Ahern [this message]
2020-02-18 23:50 ` Carmine Scarpitta
2020-02-19 1:05 ` David Ahern
2020-02-19 2:49 ` Carmine Scarpitta
2020-02-19 4:29 ` David Ahern
2020-02-20 22:33 ` Carmine Scarpitta
2020-02-21 17:31 ` David Ahern
2020-03-06 16:45 ` Ahmed Abdelsalam
2020-03-09 15:36 ` David Ahern
2020-03-10 16:26 ` Ahmed Abdelsalam
2020-02-13 1:09 ` [net-next 2/2] Add support for SRv6 End.DT4 action Carmine Scarpitta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7302c1f7-b6d1-90b7-5df1-3e5e0ba98f53@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=ahmed.abdelsalam@gssi.it \
--cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
--cc=carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it \
--cc=dav.lebrun@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.lebrun@uclouvain.be \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.lungaroni@cnit.it \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®