From: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] allow file truncations when both suid and write permissions set
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:29:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e0fb38c0907011229h328c8c48i55df5e234b7d367d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4BB898.10909@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Eric Sandeen<sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>> When suid is set and the non-owner user has write permission,
>>> any writing into this file should be allowed and suid should be
>>> removed after that.
>>>
>>> However, current kernel only allows writing without truncations,
>>> when we do truncations on that file, we get EPERM. This is a bug.
>
> ...
>
>> So I think the main problem here is simply that we didn't set
>> ATTR_FORCE, right...
>>
>> Seems a little odd to |= with ret, -then- check if it's non-0. Maybe:
>>
>> /* Remove suid/sgid on truncate too */
>> - newattrs.ia_valid |= should_remove_suid(dentry);
>> + ret = should_remove_suid(dentry);
>> + if (ret)
>> + newattrs.ia_valid |= (ret | ATTR_FORCE);
>>
>
> On second thought, and after talking w/ eparis, I think this probably
> needs a security_inode_killpriv() too... it seems like it might be best
> to change file_remove_suid(*file) to dentry_remove_suid(*dentry) and
> just call that from do_truncate()?
>
> -Eric
All of this stuff seems horribly complex.... I'm trying to wrap my
head around everything going on here as well....
-Eric (Paris)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 8:59 Amerigo Wang
2009-07-01 18:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-07-01 19:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-07-01 19:29 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2009-07-01 20:15 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-02 10:14 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-02 12:12 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-03 10:02 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e0fb38c0907011229h328c8c48i55df5e234b7d367d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eteo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®