mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] allow file truncations when both suid and write  permissions set
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:29:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e0fb38c0907011229h328c8c48i55df5e234b7d367d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4BB898.10909@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Eric Sandeen<sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>> When suid is set and the non-owner user has write permission,
>>> any writing into this file should be allowed and suid should be
>>> removed after that.
>>>
>>> However, current kernel only allows writing without truncations,
>>> when we do truncations on that file, we get EPERM. This is a bug.
>
> ...
>
>> So I think the main problem here is simply that we didn't set
>> ATTR_FORCE, right...
>>
>> Seems a little odd to |= with ret, -then- check if it's non-0.  Maybe:
>>
>>       /* Remove suid/sgid on truncate too */
>> -     newattrs.ia_valid |= should_remove_suid(dentry);
>> +     ret = should_remove_suid(dentry);
>> +     if (ret)
>> +             newattrs.ia_valid |= (ret | ATTR_FORCE);
>>
>
> On second thought, and after talking w/ eparis, I think this probably
> needs a security_inode_killpriv() too... it seems like it might be best
> to change file_remove_suid(*file) to dentry_remove_suid(*dentry) and
> just call that from do_truncate()?
>
> -Eric

All of this stuff seems horribly complex....   I'm trying to wrap my
head around everything going on here as well....

-Eric (Paris)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-25  8:59 Amerigo Wang
2009-07-01 18:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-07-01 19:27   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-07-01 19:29     ` Eric Paris [this message]
2009-07-01 20:15       ` Eric Paris
2009-07-02 10:14         ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-02 12:12           ` Eric Paris
2009-07-03 10:02             ` Amerigo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e0fb38c0907011229h328c8c48i55df5e234b7d367d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=eteo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®