From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com,
cl@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, adobriyan@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, yi.zhu@intel.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, ilw@linux.intel.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:00:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f021003240400y43484fe6q8be4e8dc22284e9b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269420538-18039-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> With the actual patch, this message would end up ~1.7M which seems tad
> bit too large to send through LKML. I said that I would post the
> whole patch on the last round but that was 200k and this one is 272K
> only with the diffstats and this one doesn't include any interesting
> stuff, so I'm snipping it again. The whole patch is available at the
> following URL.
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/patches/0003-include-cleanup-Update-gfp.h-and-slab.h-includes-to-.patch
I didn't look at the patch but I agree with the principle. How do we
get this merged before we grow more implicit dependencies?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-24 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 8:48 [PATCHSET] remove implicit slab.h inclusion from " Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 8:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: don't include slab.h from arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32.h Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 10:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-24 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-24 8:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] iwlwifi: don't include iwl-dev.h from iwl-devtrace.h Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 17:55 ` reinette chatre
2010-03-24 8:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 11:00 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2010-03-24 11:57 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-24 13:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 19:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-30 14:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-03-31 2:41 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 8:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] percpu: don't implicitly include slab.h " Tejun Heo
2010-03-24 19:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-29 0:50 ` [PATCHSET] remove implicit slab.h inclusion from " Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f021003240400y43484fe6q8be4e8dc22284e9b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®