From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
"olaf@aepfle.de" <olaf@aepfle.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link query
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:57:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <856c5dedc14a458b8100dcb2d3a2f9e6@DFM-DB3MBX15-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531543FD.7090907@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:10 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang; davem@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: KY Srinivasan; olaf@aepfle.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-
> devel@linuxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hyperv: Move state setting for link query
>
> On 03/04/2014 07:54 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > It moves the state setting for query into rndis_filter_receive_response().
> > All callbacks including query-complete and status-callback are
> > synchronized by channel->inbound_lock. This prevents pentential race
> between them.
>
> This still looks racy to me. The problem is workqueue is not synchronized with
> those here.
>
> Consider the following case in netvsc_link_change():
>
> if (rdev->link_state) {
> ... receive interrupt ...
> rndis_filter_receice_response() which changes rdev->link_state
> ...
> netif_carrier_off()
> }
>
> And also it need to schedule a work otherwise the link status is out of sync.
The rndis_filter_query_device_link_status() makes the query and wait for the
complete message, including set state, before returning.
The rndis_filter_query_device_link_status() is called from rndis_filter_device_add(),
which is called from either netvsc_change_mtu() or netvsc_probe().
The change_mtu() and netvsc_link_change() are synchronized by rtnl_lock().
In netvsc_probe(), the status query & complete happens before register_netdev(), and
the netvsc_linkstatus_callback() schedules the work only after netdevice is registered.
So, there are no race in either case.
The carrier_on/off work will be scheduled when netvsc_open() is called. Then,
the status will be updated based on the latest link_state.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 23:54 Haiyang Zhang
2014-03-04 3:09 ` Jason Wang
2014-03-04 16:57 ` Haiyang Zhang [this message]
2014-03-05 5:57 ` Jason Wang
2014-03-05 15:06 ` Haiyang Zhang
2014-03-04 19:36 ` Haiyang Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=856c5dedc14a458b8100dcb2d3a2f9e6@DFM-DB3MBX15-06.exchange.corp.microsoft.com \
--to=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®