From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB74472061 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790342115; cv=none; b=oFwFh9aKRDYOS8FYPQ5UNtyHGPxW8wkWSvelNSTD9nM4i7NArWW4juCTBWmf6PmwrHtCWshDfuZqVRtW9JUriQkawOsc0uClDLAYi9JRCxC5wBNN62I05OrNbcgfKod7ZA5J7pBcigWQpEKb2UKi2IT14cqVWT3RhT23jNzw+hA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790342115; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MtaIm76iatyPfiF7F9FpPKBCAnF0DdkrKummdNqHOHo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CZQQndVp/00sH5c2MPLBclJrNou38zAGetA/foAOpVEibKnKYGvUCKPBYs7zkrUaxqxDCaQoYKJDxCYQ5oxlZBFlKqql0Hl3SHDdY+3ME5q09zVk0xwjE75Vx0GMtvo1EJrP0YVYeFOVmOr6S05UgyCEcD/XWrdNq4DnRipqQQs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=h/61eCx4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="h/61eCx4" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E653E1A1020; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6C36073B; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 64B041032946F; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:14:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1790342097; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=Q1rGLtMVsWM8f/arBMoiZNonTnmmCJHgLO5nSGP5jAk=; b=h/61eCx4UX/gJ1xiV9AAL25CGCR8ATemeH4kDdhE2x6xdezgr2RdXkRcYlKZ0RnAp9l9JC Wq6ZmCUEOe6Gq1M82lIpg82KsGV1iSGHMM41VdS8MfB6sgReHGDgn15b5ZXHU1tOSfTuA4 xNdRR6r2Y0wJ+4qxYEm6gCgIPjuZs8N8QTE+a/Yjgv+4r60wh0V9k3lBkILyzrfbNQcPbL QIAwmSaOo8mpLrl8JZQqA/CsGse3H9pzlH/6SqlYWyYs3j0WaYO0yK0yfgR/bmjgHpl1Dz 84B9+Neq7zkTniVDCoyrreNvmpGIoVgkqL03xWcEPtRAOyCmquTW6FeS1fEkZQ== From: Miquel Raynal To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Wolfram Sang , Paul Louvel , Borislav Petkov , Tony Luck , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Herve Codina Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: edac: cdns,ddr-edac: add Cadence DDR EDAC binding In-Reply-To: (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2026 14:57:56 +0200") References: <20260924-paul-v7-3-rc1-edac-v3-0-bd8054a5b180@bootlin.com> <20260924-paul-v7-3-rc1-edac-v3-1-bd8054a5b180@bootlin.com> <8733uxlcl1.fsf@bootlin.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.12; emacs 30.2 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:14:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87fqyxjwvm.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 >> >> + items: >> >> + - const: renesas,r9a06g032-ddr-edac # RZ/N1D >> >> + - const: renesas,rzn1-ddr-edac # RZ/N1 >> > >> > We don't need a family compatible. Only N1D has a DDR controller. >> >> This is true, but from my experience with this platform, Geert used to >> request both. I'm fine exposing only one of them, but I explicitly asked >> Paul to put them both to mimic the existing bindings and keep some kind >> of uniformity. I'm fine either ways, but before we go through that >> iteration, Geert, would you mind confirming your preferences? > > Well, if only RZ/N1D has the DDR controller, there is not much point in > adding a family-specific compatible value. According to renesas.com, > RZ/N1x is obsolete, so no new family members will arrive. Ack, thanks!