From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: osalvador@suse.de, David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, azpijr@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: hugetlb: skip CMA allocations under PF_MEMALLOC_PIN
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 11:27:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b7f6573-ed12-494f-9210-d6f6dbf01567@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC5E593-7537-4659-879C-95ECC2224D2F@linux.dev>
Hi Muchun,
On 11/3/26 6:56 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 3, 2026, at 16:01, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>>
>> With gigantic overcommit enabled, a fault during long-term pinning
>> can allocate a fresh HugeTLB folio from CMA despite PF_MEMALLOC_PIN.
>>
>> The folio must then be migrated before it can be pinned. However,
>> fresh gigantic migration targets are not supported, so pinning fails
>> when the HugeTLB pool has no suitable target, even if the original
>> fault could have allocated pinnable memory outside CMA.
>>
>> Honor PF_MEMALLOC_PIN in the HugeTLB CMA allocator so the fault can
>> try the non-CMA fallback, or fail when allocation is restricted to CMA.
>
> Wait... I think my Acked-by got ahead of me here. :)
>
> There seems to be a rather odd distinction that GUP is missing.
>
> The usual reason long-term GUP must migrate a page out of a
> MIGRATE_CMA pageblock is that the page was only borrowed from CMA by the
> normal page allocator. The corresponding CMA bitmap range is still
> available, so a future CMA allocation relies on being able to migrate
> that page away. A long-term pin would prevent that.
>
> However, a HugeTLB folio returned by
> hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio() is different. It is the actual CMA
> allocation, not merely a movable page that happens to reside in a
> MIGRATE_CMA pageblock. Its range has already been marked allocated in
> the hugetlb CMA bitmap.
>
> Therefore, CMA cannot allocate that range again until the HugeTLB folio
> is freed anyway. Long-term pinning the folio does not seem to make the
> CMA area any less available than keeping the HugeTLB folio mapped for
> the same amount of time.
>
> folio_is_longterm_pinnable() currently only sees MIGRATE_CMA and does
> not distinguish these two cases. In that light, rejecting
> PF_MEMALLOC_PIN in hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio() looks like working
> around an overly broad GUP classification. It also means that
> hugetlb_cma_only users will fail the fault, while other users may consume
> a gigantic contiguous range outside the dedicated hugetlb CMA area even
> when that area has free space.
>
> Would it make more sense to fix the long-term GUP check instead, so that
> an explicitly CMA-allocated HugeTLB folio is considered pinnable, while
> ordinary pages merely borrowed from MIGRATE_CMA pageblocks remain unpinnable?
Make sense!
I'll replace this patch with an exception for HPG_cma folios in the
MIGRATE_CMA check. This also lets the HugeTLB allocator select preallocated
CMA folios during long-term pinning. MIGRATE_ISOLATE and ZONE_MOVABLE
remain restricted.
Fresh CMA allocations under PF_MEMALLOC_PIN also need to skip ranges
in ZONE_MOVABLE. Returning -EBUSY here lets CMA try its remaining ranges.
The incremental diff against this patch is below.
diff --git a/include/linux/cma.h b/include/linux/cma.h
index 8555d38a97b1..7fd1b6e65b58 100644
--- a/include/linux/cma.h
+++ b/include/linux/cma.h
@@ -21,11 +21,13 @@
#define CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES (PAGE_SIZE * CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_PAGES)
struct cma;
+struct folio;
extern unsigned long totalcma_pages;
extern phys_addr_t cma_get_base(const struct cma *cma);
extern unsigned long cma_get_size(const struct cma *cma);
extern const char *cma_get_name(const struct cma *cma);
+bool cma_folio_is_pinnable(struct folio *folio);
extern int __init cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t base,
phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit,
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index cb993a1d0728..d15810be7d96 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#define _LINUX_MM_H
#include <linux/args.h>
+#include <linux/cma.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
@@ -2975,14 +2976,16 @@ static inline bool is_zero_folio(const struct
folio *folio)
return is_zero_page(&folio->page);
}
-/* MIGRATE_CMA and ZONE_MOVABLE do not allow pin folios */
+/* Borrowed CMA pages and ZONE_MOVABLE folios cannot be pinned long
term. */
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
static inline bool folio_is_longterm_pinnable(struct folio *folio)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
int mt = folio_migratetype(folio);
- if (mt == MIGRATE_CMA || mt == MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
+ if (mt == MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
+ return false;
+ if (mt == MIGRATE_CMA && !cma_folio_is_pinnable(folio))
return false;
#endif
/* The zero page can be "pinned" but gets special handling. */
diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
index a10ea37a261d..c2814f54f86a 100644
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/cma.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
#include <trace/events/cma.h>
@@ -55,6 +56,12 @@ const char *cma_get_name(const struct cma *cma)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cma_get_name);
+bool cma_folio_is_pinnable(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ /* Explicit HugeTLB CMA allocations own their bitmap ranges. */
+ return folio_test_hugetlb(folio) && folio_test_hugetlb_cma(folio);
+}
+
static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(const struct cma *cma,
unsigned int align_order)
{
@@ -792,6 +799,11 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct
cma_memrange *cmr,
int ret = -EBUSY;
struct page *page = NULL;
+ /* Each range lies within one zone; try other ranges if needed. */
+ if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN) &&
+ is_zone_movable_page(pfn_to_page(cmr->base_pfn)))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
mask = cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(cma, align);
offset = cma_bitmap_aligned_offset(cma, cmr, align);
bitmap_maxno = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma, cmr);
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
index dde1c866406f..95fd2d190f0d 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
@@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio(int
order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (!hugetlb_cma_size)
return NULL;
- if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN)
- return NULL;
-
retry_cpuset:
if (!nodemask) {
cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
Thanks,
Qi
>
> Thanks,
> Muchun
>
>>
>> Fixes: eb02f14c4a2b ("mm/hugetlb: allow overcommitting gigantic hugepages")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb_cma.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
>> index 95fd2d190f0d2..dde1c866406fb 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>> if (!hugetlb_cma_size)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> + if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_PIN)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> retry_cpuset:
>> if (!nodemask) {
>> cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
>> --
>> 2.54.0
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 8:01 [PATCH 0/4] mm: hugetlb: fix some CMA-related issues Qi Zheng
2026-11-03 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: hugetlb: disable default CMA reservations on 32-bit kernel Qi Zheng
2026-11-03 8:41 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-03 11:40 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-03 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: hugetlb: skip CMA allocations under PF_MEMALLOC_PIN Qi Zheng
2026-11-03 8:44 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-03 10:56 ` Muchun Song
2026-11-03 11:59 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-04 3:27 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2026-11-03 8:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: hugetlb: skip CMA when direct reclaim is disallowed Qi Zheng
2026-11-03 8:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: hugetlb: respect cpuset restrictions for surplus allocations Qi Zheng
2026-11-03 12:21 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-04 3:39 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b7f6573-ed12-494f-9210-d6f6dbf01567@linux.dev \
--to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®