From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.4] sched_ext: Clear a sub-scheduler's caps before ops.sub_detach()
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 12:39:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fd657b9-4bd4-48a4-a359-62096ba14bec@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b46300eda6da03d56262fcdcbfc9b4fa@kernel.org>
Hello Tejun,
在 2026/10/7 04:31, Tejun Heo 写道:
> A sub-scheduler can leave standing state behind on the cids delegated to it,
> cpuperf targets being the obvious case, and the kernel does not track who
> wrote it. Restoring it is the parent's job and ops.sub_detach() is the place
> for it. Today the parent can't rely on that: the dying sub-scheduler keeps
> every cap until it is marked dead after ops.exit(), so its ops.exit() or a
> late timer can write after the parent has cleaned up.
>
> Clear every cap of the sub-scheduler before ops.sub_detach(). The pshard
> caps go first as a pending sync recomputes ecaps from them, and ecaps are
> then zeroed directly. A grant racing the clear is refused under the child's
> pshard lock, so nothing hands the caps back.
>
> Fixes: 86094b95efcf ("sched_ext: Add per-shard cap delegation for sub-schedulers")
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
> Applied to sched_ext/for-7.4.
>
Tested this patch on a kvm guest running a sched_ext/for-7.4 based
tree with the patch applied, using a pair of cid-form test schedulers:
a parent that grants SCX_CAP_PERF | SCX_CAP_ENQ_IMMED on a cgroup to a
child, and the child writing cpuperf target 1 from ops.tick(). The
parent either restores SCX_CPUPERF_ONE for the delegated cids in
ops.sub_detach() or does nothing, and rq->scx.cpuperf_target is
sampled every second.
With a restoring parent: the child writes target 1 while alive; after
SIGTERM and disable, the parent's ops.sub_detach() write of
SCX_CPUPERF_ONE lands and stays - the child's ops.exit() and timers no
longer overtake the parent's cleanup, which is exactly the gap this
patch closes.
With a parent that does not restore: the child's last written target
persists after the child goes away, as expected from treating the
target as last-writer-wins state.
Both runs are clean with lockdep enabled (no warnings or splats).
Tested-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Thanks.
--
Tao
> kernel/sched/ext/internal.h | 7 ++++++
> kernel/sched/ext/sub.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> @@ -828,6 +828,10 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
> /**
> * @sub_detach: Detach a sub-scheduler
> * @args: argument container, see the struct definition
> + *
> + * The sub-scheduler holds no caps by this point and can no longer
> + * affect any cid. Whatever was delegated to it, e.g. cpuperf targets,
> + * is the parent's to restore here.
> */
> void (*sub_detach)(struct scx_sub_detach_args *args);
>
> @@ -911,6 +915,9 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
> * ops.exit() is also called on ops.init() failure, which is a bit
> * unusual. This is to allow rich reporting through @info on how
> * ops.init() failed.
> + *
> + * A sub-scheduler holds no caps by the time ops.exit() runs. Its
> + * cap-gated kfuncs are denied.
> */
> void (*exit)(struct scx_exit_info *info);
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,34 @@ void scx_offline_ecaps(struct rq *rq)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Clear every cap @sch holds. The pshard caps go first as they are the source a
> + * pending sync recomputes ecaps from. ecaps are then zeroed directly for the
> + * cap checks.
> + */
> +static void clear_all_caps(struct scx_sched *sch)
> +{
> + s32 si, cpu;
> + u32 cap_bit;
> +
> + /* enable may have failed before scx_alloc_pshards() */
> + if (!sch->pshard)
> + return;
> +
> + for (si = 0; si < sch->nr_pshards; si++) {
> + struct scx_pshard *ps = sch->pshard[si];
> +
> + guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&ps->lock);
> + for (cap_bit = 0; cap_bit < __SCX_NR_CAPS; cap_bit++)
> + scx_cmask_clear(&ps->caps[cap_bit].cmask);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + guard(rq_lock_irqsave)(cpu_rq(cpu));
> + WRITE_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu)->ecaps, 0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * @pcpu's sched was unhashed before the grace period, so nothing re-queues its
> * sync node. Remove the node from @rq's pending list so the pcpu can be freed.
> */
> @@ -1628,6 +1656,12 @@ dump:
>
> scx_unlink_sched(sch);
>
> + /*
> + * The parent restores what it delegated in ops.sub_detach(). @sch must
> + * hold no caps by then.
> + */
> + clear_all_caps(sch);
> +
> mutex_unlock(&scx_enable_mutex);
>
> /*
> @@ -2306,8 +2340,8 @@ static s32 sub_cap_preamble(u64 cgroup_i
> * All-or-nothing keeps the caller-visible result binary per cid, so the denied
> * mask is one mask to interpret rather than a per-cap matrix.
> *
> - * Return 0 on full success, -EPERM if any cid was refused, or a negative
> - * errno on other failures.
> + * Return 0 on full success, -EPERM if any cid was refused, -ENODEV if the child
> + * is gone or being disabled, or a negative errno on other failures.
> */
> __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_sub_grant(u64 cgroup_id, u64 caps,
> const struct scx_cmask *cmask__arena,
> @@ -2361,6 +2395,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_sub_grant(u64 cg
> scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &pps->lock) {
> guard(raw_spinlock_nested)(&cps->lock);
>
> + /* the child is being disabled, see clear_all_caps() */
> + if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(child->aborting))) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Narrow granted_cids to cids the parent holds every
> * requested cap on. All-or-nothing per cid.
> @@ -2413,9 +2453,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_sub_grant(u64 cg
> }
> }
>
> + ret = any_denied ? -EPERM : 0;
> +out:
> caps_updated_deliver(&to_deliver);
> -
> - return any_denied ? -EPERM : 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 20:31 Tejun Heo
2026-10-06 22:14 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-08 4:39 ` Tao Cui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fd657b9-4bd4-48a4-a359-62096ba14bec@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®