mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Koutn? <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v4 03/22] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 18:25:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <950ad328-d16d-4cfc-b130-6a43530507ae@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101114206.2434398-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev>



在 2026/11/1 19:41, Ridong Chen 写道:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> 
> Refactor validate_partition() to take the parent partition, the new
> partition root state, the new effective exclusive CPUs and the CPUs to
> be deleted, instead of a trial cpuset. A NULL parent stands for a
> remote partition, whose CPUs come from top_cpuset. This makes the
> interface flexible enough to handle both local and remote partition
> validation.
> 
> The housekeeping conflict check is folded into validate_partition(). It
> is skipped when the parent is not a valid partition root, as @cs can't
> be a valid local partition in that case.
> 
> Use the new interface for local partition enablement in
> update_parent_effective_cpumask() and in partition_cpus_change(),
> replacing the open-coded checks there. The order of the checks is now
> the same for both paths: empty CPUs, housekeeping conflict, then no CPU
> left for tasks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>

nit: is this old tag still needed?

Thanks,
Guopeng

> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index df9fc126e391..df52f6e5e99f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1438,6 +1438,41 @@ static bool prstate_housekeeping_conflict(int new_prs, int parent_prs,
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * validate_partition - Validate a cpuset partition configuration
> + * @cs: The cpuset to validate
> + * @parent: Parent partition of @cs, NULL for remote partition
> + * @new_prs: The proposed new partition root state
> + * @new_excpus: The new effective exclusive CPUs mask to validate
> + * @del: exclusive CPUs to be deleted from @cs, can be NULL
> + *
> + * The housekeeping check is skipped if @parent is not a valid partition
> + * root as @cs can't be a valid local partition in that case.
> + *
> + * Return: PRS error code (0 if valid, non-zero error code if invalid)
> + */
> +static enum prs_errcode validate_partition(struct cpuset *cs,
> +		struct cpuset *parent, int new_prs,
> +		struct cpumask *new_excpus, struct cpumask *del)
> +{
> +	int parent_prs = parent ? parent->partition_root_state : PRS_ROOT;
> +
> +	if (new_prs == PRS_MEMBER)
> +		return PERR_NONE;
> +
> +	if (cpumask_empty(new_excpus))
> +		return PERR_INVCPUS;
> +
> +	if ((parent_prs > 0) &&
> +	    prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs, new_excpus, del))
> +		return PERR_HKEEPING;
> +
> +	if (tasks_nocpu_error(parent_cs(cs), cs, new_excpus))
> +		return PERR_NOCPUS;
> +
> +	return PERR_NONE;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock - Rebuild sched domains, update HK & unlock
>   *
> @@ -1955,18 +1990,10 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
>  	if ((cmd == partcmd_enable) || (cmd == partcmd_enablei)) {
>  		new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Enabling partition root is not allowed if its
> -		 * effective_xcpus is empty.
> -		 */
> -		if (cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask))
> -			return PERR_INVCPUS;
> -
> -		if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs, tmp->delmask, NULL))
> -			return PERR_HKEEPING;
> -
> -		if (nocpu)
> -			return PERR_NOCPUS;
> +		part_error = validate_partition(cs, parent, new_prs,
> +						tmp->delmask, NULL);
> +		if (part_error)
> +			return part_error;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * This function will only be called when all the preliminary
> @@ -2432,32 +2459,6 @@ static int parse_cpuset_cpulist(const char *buf, struct cpumask *out_mask)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * validate_partition - Validate a cpuset partition configuration
> - * @cs: The cpuset to validate
> - * @trialcs: The trial cpuset containing proposed configuration changes
> - *
> - * If any validation check fails, the appropriate error code is set in the
> - * cpuset's prs_err field.
> - *
> - * Return: PRS error code (0 if valid, non-zero error code if invalid)
> - */
> -static enum prs_errcode validate_partition(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs)
> -{
> -	struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
> -
> -	if (cs_is_member(trialcs))
> -		return PERR_NONE;
> -
> -	if (cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus))
> -		return PERR_INVCPUS;
> -
> -	if (tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, trialcs->effective_xcpus))
> -		return PERR_NOCPUS;
> -
> -	return PERR_NONE;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * partition_cpus_change - Handle partition state changes due to CPU mask updates
>   * @cs: The target cpuset being modified
> @@ -2471,33 +2472,24 @@ static void partition_cpus_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
>  				  struct tmpmasks *tmp)
>  {
>  	enum prs_errcode prs_err;
> -	int parent_prs = is_remote_partition(cs)
> -		       ? PRS_ROOT : parent_cs(cs)->partition_root_state;
> +	struct cpuset *parent = is_remote_partition(cs) ? NULL : parent_cs(cs);
>  
>  	if (cs_is_member(cs))
>  		return;
>  
> -	prs_err = validate_partition(cs, trialcs);
> -	if (!prs_err && (parent_prs > 0) &&
> -	    !cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus)) {
> -		int prs = cs->partition_root_state;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Check for housekeeping conflict by passing the whole
> -		 * effective_xcpus as well as those CPUs that are to be
> -		 * removed from cs as delmask.
> -		 */
> -		if (prs > 0)
> -			cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
> -				       trialcs->effective_xcpus);
> -		else
> -			cpumask_clear(tmp->delmask);
> -
> -		if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(prs, parent_prs,
> -						  trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp->delmask))
> -			prs_err = PERR_HKEEPING;
> -	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Check for housekeeping conflict by passing the whole
> +	 * effective_xcpus as well as those CPUs that are to be
> +	 * removed from cs as delmask.
> +	 */
> +	if (is_partition_valid(cs))
> +		cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
> +			       trialcs->effective_xcpus);
> +	else
> +		cpumask_clear(tmp->delmask);
>  
> +	prs_err = validate_partition(cs, parent, trialcs->partition_root_state,
> +				     trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp->delmask);
>  	if (prs_err) {
>  		WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, prs_err);
>  		trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-01 11:41 [RFC PATCH -v4 00/22] cpuset: rework local partition logic Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 01/22] cpuset: add early empty cpumask check in partition_xcpus_add/del Ridong Chen
2026-11-03 10:20   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 02/22] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent Ridong Chen
2026-11-03 10:23   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 03/22] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface Ridong Chen
2026-11-03 10:25   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-11-03 12:29     ` Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 04/22] cpuset: introduce partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-03 10:26   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-11-03 12:44     ` Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 05/22] cpuset: introduce partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 06/22] cpuset: introduce partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 07/22] cpuset: use partition_enable() for remote partition enablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 08/22] cpuset: use partition_disable() for remote partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 09/22] cpuset: use partition_update() for remote partition update Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 10/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 11/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 12/22] cpuset: use local_partition_disable() to invalidate local partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 13/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 14/22] cpuset: remove update_parent_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 15/22] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 16/22] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 17/22] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 18/22] cpuset: use validate_local_partition in local_partition_enable Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 19/22] cpuset: introduce validate_remote_partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 20/22] cpuset: simplify the update_prstate() function Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 21/22] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 22/22] cpuset: remove unnecessary validation in partition_cpus_change Ridong Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=950ad328-d16d-4cfc-b130-6a43530507ae@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®