From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@gmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>,
"Bryan O'Donoghue" <bod@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/4] phy: core: Fix use-after-free in phy_get paths
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 09:45:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEp6-2nWfjF18R9pw0xFt92GcPORKKa+ix8czQ=m512TYuP8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v14-1-01ef1eced075@linaro.org>
Hi Bryan,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 12:59 AM Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Sashiko asked during a patch review if the existing usage pattern had a
> race condition; specifically in of_phy_get() if it was possible between
> returning from _of_phy_get() and running try_module_get() that a module
> might be unbound leading to use-after-free.
>
> Looking at the code this appears to be so, there is no linkage between the
> phy and module under a synchronisation primitive.
>
> Using the phy_provider_mutex in phy_get() will ensure there is a link between
> the returned phy pointer and the module_get() bumping the module reference
> count.
>
> Amend phy_get(), of_phy_get() and devm_of_phy_get_by_index() to fix the
> same usage pattern.
>
> phy_provider_unregister() must take the phy_provider_mutex so amending
> phy_get()/of_phy_get() to take that same mutex guarantees there is no
> use-after-free.
>
> Fixes: ff764963479a1 ("drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> index 21aaf2f76e53e..cd9ace125567a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> @@ -124,13 +124,11 @@ static struct phy *phy_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> const char *dev_id = dev_name(dev);
> struct phy_lookup *p, *pl = NULL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(p, &phys, node)
> if (!strcmp(p->dev_id, dev_id) && !strcmp(p->con_id, con_id)) {
> pl = p;
> break;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
>
> return pl ? pl->phy : ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> }
> @@ -635,11 +633,10 @@ static struct phy *_of_phy_get(struct device_node *np, int index)
> goto out_put_node;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
Then, now we're moving the responsibility to the callers, maybe we should have:
lockdep_assert_held(&phy_provider_mutex)
> phy_provider = of_phy_provider_lookup(args.np);
> if (IS_ERR(phy_provider) || !try_module_get(phy_provider->owner)) {
> phy = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> - goto out_unlock;
> + goto out_put_node;
> }
>
> if (!of_device_is_available(args.np)) {
> @@ -653,8 +650,6 @@ static struct phy *_of_phy_get(struct device_node *np, int index)
> out_put_module:
> module_put(phy_provider->owner);
>
> -out_unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> out_put_node:
> of_node_put(args.np);
>
> @@ -678,15 +673,21 @@ struct phy *of_phy_get(struct device_node *np, const char *con_id)
> if (con_id)
> index = of_property_match_string(np, "phy-names", con_id);
>
> + mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> +
> phy = _of_phy_get(np, index);
> if (IS_ERR(phy))
> - return phy;
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> - if (!try_module_get(phy->ops->owner))
> - return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + if (!try_module_get(phy->ops->owner)) {
> + phy = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
>
> get_device(&phy->dev);
>
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> return phy;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_phy_get);
> @@ -786,6 +787,7 @@ struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, const char *string)
> struct phy *phy;
> struct device_link *link;
>
> + mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> if (dev->of_node) {
> if (string)
> index = of_property_match_string(dev->of_node, "phy-names",
> @@ -796,15 +798,18 @@ struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, const char *string)
> } else {
> if (string == NULL) {
> dev_WARN(dev, "missing string\n");
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + phy = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
> phy = phy_find(dev, string);
> }
> if (IS_ERR(phy))
> - return phy;
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> - if (!try_module_get(phy->ops->owner))
> - return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + if (!try_module_get(phy->ops->owner)) {
> + phy = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
>
> get_device(&phy->dev);
>
> @@ -813,6 +818,8 @@ struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, const char *string)
> dev_dbg(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
> dev_name(phy->dev.parent));
>
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> return phy;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_get);
> @@ -961,15 +968,17 @@ struct phy *devm_of_phy_get_by_index(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
> if (!ptr)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> + mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> phy = _of_phy_get(np, index);
> if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> devres_free(ptr);
> - return phy;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> if (!try_module_get(phy->ops->owner)) {
> devres_free(ptr);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + phy = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> get_device(&phy->dev);
> @@ -982,6 +991,8 @@ struct phy *devm_of_phy_get_by_index(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
> dev_dbg(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
> dev_name(phy->dev.parent));
>
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
> return phy;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_phy_get_by_index);
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 22:59 [PATCH v14 0/4] Add phy_get_by_of_node and devm helper Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v14 1/4] phy: core: Fix use-after-free in phy_get paths Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-04 7:45 ` Loic Poulain [this message]
2026-09-04 9:41 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-04 12:39 ` Loic Poulain
2026-09-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v14 2/4] phy: core: Add phy_get_by_of_node() Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v14 3/4] phy: core: Add devm_phy_get_by_of_node() Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v14 4/4] media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices Bryan O'Donoghue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEp6-2nWfjF18R9pw0xFt92GcPORKKa+ix8czQ=m512TYuP8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=bod@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=todor.too@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®