Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/page_alloc: refactor build_node_zonelist() out of build_zonelists()

["Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>]

On Sun Sep 20, 2026 at 10:49 PM EDT, Zi Yan wrote:
> On Fri Sep 11, 2026 at 11:04 PM EDT, Gregory Price wrote:
>> Extract per-node fallback-list construction into build_node_zonelist().
>> Build each selected node directly into the destination zonelist so no
>> intermediate node_order array or node count is needed. Print the fallback
>> order as each node is added.
>>
>> This lets us build new zonelists from candidate nodemasks instead of just
>> the default N_MEMORY node state list.
>>
>> No functional change: build_zonelists() builds and prints the same FALLBACK
>> list over N_MEMORY with node_load updates as before.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
>> ---
>>  mm/page_alloc.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 7efce139d562..d1888d5630e0 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -5857,31 +5857,6 @@ int find_next_best_node_in(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask,
>>  }
>>  
>>  
>> -/*
>> - * Build zonelists ordered by node and zones within node.
>> - * This results in maximum locality--normal zone overflows into local
>> - * DMA zone, if any--but risks exhausting DMA zone.
>> - */
>> -static void build_zonelists_in_node_order(pg_data_t *pgdat, int *node_order,
>> -		unsigned nr_nodes)
>> -{
>> -	struct zoneref *zonerefs;
>> -	int i;
>> -
>> -	zonerefs = pgdat->node_zonelists[ZONELIST_FALLBACK]._zonerefs;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
>> -		int nr_zones;
>> -
>> -		pg_data_t *node = NODE_DATA(node_order[i]);
>> -
>> -		nr_zones = build_zonerefs_node(node, zonerefs);
>> -		zonerefs += nr_zones;
>> -	}
>> -	zonerefs->zone = NULL;
>> -	zonerefs->zone_idx = 0;
>> -}
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Build __GFP_THISNODE zonelists
>>   */
>> @@ -5897,20 +5872,24 @@ static void build_thisnode_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>>  	zonerefs->zone_idx = 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>> +/*
>> + * Build one zonelist ordered by node and zones within node. This results in
>> + * maximum locality--normal zone overflows into local DMA zone, if any--but
>> + * risks exhausting DMA zone.
>> + */
>> +static void build_node_zonelist(pg_data_t *pgdat, const nodemask_t *candidates,
>> +				int zlidx)

Is build_numa_aware_zonelist() a better name? Since the old comment said
"NUMA-aware ording of nodes" and the code uses find_next_best_node_in().

>>  {
>> -	static int node_order[MAX_NUMNODES];
>> -	int node, nr_nodes = 0;
>> +	struct zoneref *zonerefs = pgdat->node_zonelists[zlidx]._zonerefs;
>
> Why does build_node_zonelist() need to have a new zlidx instead of using
> ZONELIST_FALLBACK like build_zonelists_in_node_order() did?
>
>>  	nodemask_t used_mask = NODE_MASK_NONE;
>> -	int local_node, prev_node;
>> +	int local_node = pgdat->node_id;
>> +	int prev_node = local_node;
>> +	int node;
>>  
>> -	/* NUMA-aware ordering of nodes */
>> -	local_node = pgdat->node_id;
>> -	prev_node = local_node;
>> +	pr_info("Fallback order for Node %d: ", local_node);
>>  
>> -	memset(node_order, 0, sizeof(node_order));
>>  	while ((node = find_next_best_node_in(local_node, &used_mask,
>> -					      &node_states[N_MEMORY])) >= 0) {
>> +					      candidates)) >= 0) {
>>  		/*
>>  		 * We don't want to pressure a particular node.
>>  		 * So adding penalty to the first node in same
>> @@ -5920,18 +5899,22 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>>  		    node_distance(local_node, prev_node))
>>  			node_load[node] += 1;
>>  
>> -		node_order[nr_nodes++] = node;
>> +		zonerefs += build_zonerefs_node(NODE_DATA(node), zonerefs);
>> +		pr_cont("%d ", node);
>>  		prev_node = node;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	build_zonelists_in_node_order(pgdat, node_order, nr_nodes);
>> -	build_thisnode_zonelists(pgdat);
>> -	pr_info("Fallback order for Node %d: ", local_node);
>> -	for (node = 0; node < nr_nodes; node++)
>> -		pr_cont("%d ", node_order[node]);
>> +	zonerefs->zone = NULL;
>> +	zonerefs->zone_idx = 0;
>>  	pr_cont("\n");
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>> +{
>> +	build_node_zonelist(pgdat, &node_states[N_MEMORY], ZONELIST_FALLBACK);
>> +	build_thisnode_zonelists(pgdat);
>
> If build_thisnode_zonelists() means ZONELIST_NOFALLBACK, why
> cannot build_node_zonelist() imply ZONELIST_FALLBACK?
>
>> +}
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
>>  /*
>>   * Return node id of node used for "local" allocations.




-- 
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi