RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: x86: Virtualize AMD CPUID faulting

["Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@amd.com>]

AMD General

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2026 1:02 PM
> To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>; Kaplan, David
> <David.Kaplan@amd.com>
> Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com; tglx@kernel.org; mingo@redhat.com;
> bp@alien8.de; dave.hansen@linux.intel.com; x86@kernel.org;
> hpa@zytor.com; shuah@kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; ctpence@google.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: x86: Virtualize AMD CPUID faulting
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 9:35 AM Sean Christopherson
> <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2026, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 9:20 AM Sean Christopherson
> <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > > > Oooh, this is based on the generic CPL rules.  I didn't think about it from
> that
> > > > perspective.  So yeah, addressing that does make sense.  What a pain.
> > >
> > > When I fix this in version 4, what's the correct footer for Sashiko
> attribution:
> > >
> > > Assisted-by: Sashiko:gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Sashiko:gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
> >
> > This, or even just:
> >
> >   Reported-by: Sashiko
> >
> > is good enough for me.  I don't expect random developers to know or care
> what
> > model was used, at least not when it comes to reporting bugs.  If you use AI
> to
> > help write the code, then maybe I'd care?
>
> I had Jetski write an empirical test to see how the hardware behaves.
> On the first userspace CPUID VM-exit, temporarily set #GP on userspace
> CPUID per the appropriate vendor's mechanism, make sure that we
> intercept #GP, and re-enter the guest without advancing RIP. Then, see
> what the next VM-exit is.
>
> Surprise!
>
> kvm_intel: KVM: EMPIRICAL TEST RESULT: #GP took precedence over CPUID
> VM-exit
> kvm_amd: KVM: EMPIRICAL TEST RESULT (SVM): CPUID VM-exit took
> precedence over #GP!
>
> LOL!
>
> David: Is this intentional or a bug?

This appears to be a bug, as most other instructions (e.g. INVPCID) that have CPL checks do the CPL checks before the VMEXIT checks.  I'm following up on this internally...

Thanks for bringing this to our attention
--David Kaplan