From: <gmack@innerfire.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:36:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <S264322AbTLERgM/20031205173643Z+1105@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
>From gmack@innerfire.net Fri Dec 5 12:36:11 2003
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 17:36:11 -0000
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:36:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Gerhard Mack <gmack@innerfire.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
cc: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312042245350.9125@home.osdl.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312051232530.16547@innerfire.net>
References: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKMEIDIHAA.davids@webmaster.com>
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0312042245350.9125@home.osdl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.5 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,USER_IN_WHITELIST version=2.20
X-Spam-Level:
Those views are scary when you consider that webmaster Inc sells closed
source software that works exactly like IRC (wich is GPL)
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:58:09 -0800 (PST)
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
>
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, David Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > The GPL gives you the unrestricted right to *use* the original work.
> > This implicitly includes the right to peform any step necessary to use
> > the work.
>
> No it doesn't.
>
> Your logic is fundamentally flawed, and/or your reading skills are
> deficient.
>
> The GPL expressly states that the license does not restrict the act of
> "running the Program" in any way, and yes, in that sense you may "use" the
> program in whatever way you want.
>
> But that "use" is clearly limited to running the resultant program. It
> very much does NOT say that you can "use the header files in any way you
> want, including building non-GPL'd programs with them".
>
> In fact, it very much says the reverse. If you use the source code to
> build a new program, the GPL _explicitly_ says that that new program has
> to be GPL'd too.
>
> > Please tell me how you use a kernel header file, other than by including
> > it in a code file, compiling that code file, and executing the result.
>
> You are a weasel, and you are trying to make the world look the way you
> want it to, rather than the way it _is_.
>
> You use the word "use" in a sense that is not compatible with the GPL. You
> claim that the GPL says that you can "use the program any way you want",
> but that is simply not accurate or even _close_ to accurate. Go back and
> read the GPL again. It says:
>
> "The act of running the Program is not restricted"
>
> and it very much does NOT say
>
> "The act of using parts of the source code of the Program is not
> restricted"
>
> In short: you do _NOT_ have the right to use a kernel header file (or any
> other part of the kernel sources), unless that use results in a GPL'd
> program.
>
> What you _do_ have the right is to _run_ the kernel any way you please
> (this is the part you would like to redefine as "use the source code",
> but that definition simply isn't allowed by the license, however much you
> protest to the contrary).
>
> So you can run the kernel and create non-GPL'd programs while running it
> to your hearts content. You can use it to control a nuclear submarine, and
> that's totally outside the scope of the license (but if you do, please
> note that the license does not imply any kind of warranty or similar).
>
> BUT YOU CAN NOT USE THE KERNEL HEADER FILES TO CREATE NON-GPL'D BINARIES.
>
> Comprende?
>
> Linus
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Gerhard Mack
gmack@innerfire.net
<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-05 17:36 gmack [this message]
2003-12-05 23:16 ` Oliver Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=S264322AbTLERgM/20031205173643Z+1105@vger.kernel.org \
--to=gmack@innerfire.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®