From: Feng Liu <feliu@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
Bodong Wang <bodong@nvidia.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-pci: Fix legacy device flag setting error in probe
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:43:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6bf9478-af97-4f3f-7600-1c52e27242bc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEv1b698NcpZHxpDoNokWH0gEs07D2eYSAjsiF1efhxORw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2023-07-19 p.m.10:27, Jason Wang wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:46 PM Feng Liu <feliu@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> The 'is_legacy' flag is used to differentiate between legacy vs modern
>> device. Currently, it is based on the value of vp_dev->ldev.ioaddr.
>> However, due to the shared memory of the union between struct
>> virtio_pci_legacy_device and struct virtio_pci_modern_device, when
>> virtio_pci_modern_probe modifies the content of struct
>> virtio_pci_modern_device, it affects the content of struct
>> virtio_pci_legacy_device, and ldev.ioaddr is no longer zero, causing
>> the 'is_legacy' flag to be set as true. To resolve issue, when legacy
>> device is probed, mark 'is_legacy' as true, when modern device is
>> probed, keep 'is_legacy' as false.
>>
>> Fixes: 4f0fc22534e3 ("virtio_pci: Optimize virtio_pci_device structure size")
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <feliu@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 2 --
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
>> index a6c86f916dbd..c2524a7207cf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
>> @@ -557,8 +557,6 @@ static int virtio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
>>
>> pci_set_master(pci_dev);
>>
>> - vp_dev->is_legacy = vp_dev->ldev.ioaddr ? true : false;
>> -
>> rc = register_virtio_device(&vp_dev->vdev);
>> reg_dev = vp_dev;
>> if (rc)
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> index 2257f1b3d8ae..d9cbb02b35a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ int virtio_pci_legacy_probe(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev)
>> vp_dev->config_vector = vp_config_vector;
>> vp_dev->setup_vq = setup_vq;
>> vp_dev->del_vq = del_vq;
>> + vp_dev->is_legacy = true;
>
> This seems break force_legacy for modern device:
>
> if (force_legacy) {
> rc = virtio_pci_legacy_probe(vp_dev);
> /* Also try modern mode if we can't map BAR0 (no IO space). */
> if (rc == -ENODEV || rc == -ENOMEM)
> rc = virtio_pci_modern_probe(vp_dev);
>
> Thanks
>
Hi, Jason
In the case of force_legacy, if no IO space occurs, function will return
directly after vp_legacy_probe, and will not run vp_dev->is_legacy =
true; because vp_dev is allocated through kzalloc, the default
vp_dev->is_legacy is false, which It is expected for modern device, so
it will not break modern device.
What do you think?
int virtio_pci_legacy_probe(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev)
{
[...]
rc = vp_legacy_probe(ldev);
if (rc)
return rc; /* if no IO space, function will return from here */
[...]
vp_dev->is_legacy = true;
}
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 15:45 Feng Liu
2023-07-20 2:06 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-07-20 2:27 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-20 2:46 ` Feng Liu
2023-07-20 16:43 ` Feng Liu [this message]
2023-07-20 17:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-24 13:14 ` Feng Liu
2023-07-25 3:41 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-25 4:18 ` Feng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6bf9478-af97-4f3f-7600-1c52e27242bc@nvidia.com \
--to=feliu@nvidia.com \
--cc=bodong@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®