From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Cc: dlemoal@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ata: pata_parport: pin the protocol module before device_register()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:53:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arKWUwJeXUdGHpp0@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <952bac5f61dc69079c3ffe62d6392bcc89f6aac0.1790047457.git.xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Hello Pei,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 11:38:00AM +0800, Pei Xiao wrote:
> pi_init_one() calls device_register() before try_module_get(). Between
> these two calls the device is already visible but the module is not
> pinned yet, so an unload in this window leaves pi->proto dangling:
>
> pi_init_one() rmmod -f <proto>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> device_register(&pi->dev)
> device visible on the bus
> module memory freed
> pi->proto = pr <- writes into freed memory / dangles
> try_module_get(...) <- too late, module already gone
>
> Take the module reference before registering the device, and drop it
> on the device_register() failure path.
>
> Fixes: 246a1c4c6b7f ("ata: pata_parport: add driver (PARIDE replacement)")
> Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Looking at the code, this race cannot happen.
All three callers hold pi_mutex throughout pi_init_one().
pata_parport_unregister_driver() also acquires the mutex
before unregistering.
Thus, unload cannot complete at the same time as pi_init_one().
So the motivation looks wrong.
Additionally, rmmod -f bypasses a non-zero module reference count,
so I don't see how taking a refcount earlier would solve a rmmod -f.
Are you building your kernel with CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD ?
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 3:37 [PATCH v3 0/2] some fixes in pata_parport Pei Xiao
2026-09-22 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ata: pata_parport: pin the protocol module before device_register() Pei Xiao
2026-09-22 14:53 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-23 1:17 ` Pei Xiao
2026-09-22 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ata: pata_parport: fix parport attach idr_alloc for Pei Xiao
2026-09-22 14:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 14:56 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 0/2] some fixes in pata_parport Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arKWUwJeXUdGHpp0@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaopei01@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®