From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C10749B5C5; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791298890; cv=none; b=hRluSJF8v8JklVbqlgf1AKB3AlueqeN6lqdc7I7LTyqF0yk5zaXeFhr+HMGnJ7XBd1aEnuEhbvlZVaISBzaY1JrF4uQ6MNdzyOidJ87OShI9f6QigNzo8cP76bZ4mIFAiXjc047lEDD5QdJhW4yti58g3AxhAvBkzkVGEmgnCRg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791298890; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vKUlAkv9kE2jfuS5he8GuXJYsMBv8JxaqPzw/w2RK7A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e2c+9xxQ0PVL76UfK6HJDXpOYYvWSsnOeULEaPgs0YTcl4YsbZucXLlWNqgLe1N8SZzKnODRuTfHuLnc+0xiqbdIgVFTc9OhIrzpmifSAb5ObMqu1U3P5NH004V+dGmEeFXGW7K6QBvZ776emQVgcwWbWlvRyMCrFtc6jUNdQMg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=A9P9NTJ2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="A9P9NTJ2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49BF11F0089B; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:01:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791298888; bh=zP7bMLfk/y3kcdTgl7DbKryqJaH2lXO8Bn7/SsVoFtY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=A9P9NTJ2DITgGi7O1t/cEg7rvO7Nk5MQywPHqp0ukCx9CMbFC4b+tv4jWlIGjt8LC WcCShLyQuWtxeSKpFvWzij97IKE78K2jiev2wgaLPGTAsVDyMS9OKvbStox0G4Gny/ sZGlD71l92zxyuGpUtzmosHzXjU6aDNx4C1XOaG7U1x6uuIiwNWtO57jW4flC0MR5z +uEFxL8BOSz8+PP0mK/mzyK1Ec/q6aArxcH6+pGvKxTorSdlGTYB4uOO2JKkpwr6uL SHeDJ5BvLDDw8Va8i2Yd9TEgUzf76cfb/8UAEBoFAJF2zHkuRv552SehMAXqrWUj4M aF2Bk9ax77DDQ== Received: by traversing.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 383CE172A99A; Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:01:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 17:01:24 +0200 From: Mark Brown To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Shuah Khan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Check for -EPERM not -EBUSY in the locking test Message-ID: References: <20260910-arm64-gcs-lock-eperm-v1-0-d88e51855c9f@kernel.org> <20260910-arm64-gcs-lock-eperm-v1-2-d88e51855c9f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WTcFK7zLwtuPcd2Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Use the Force, Luke. --WTcFK7zLwtuPcd2Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 03:42:14PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 08:00:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > The API has been updated to return the more permissive -EPERM rather > ^^^^^^^^^^ > "descriptive" like in the first patch? Yes. --WTcFK7zLwtuPcd2Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmrFDTsACgkQJNaLcl1U h9D2Vgf9F8JtWBoktO7Uhu1XHssouxkmCvbDMt0+2dsV3P0CsnBTKlfKfVA0Av7p ZTyEwDnIUm8YL4u3swJabYZO6zhbVnfMOJ9gFeA2k6eQ0xJOnHccyyMJsvCt7MN7 t87pPnXvEKoOom8Q02JpzfVTyO6RkSK14YuR/chrioW9KeYHq21/bjguDcF/K02/ uCLLqFLO41qlbteL3InrkjmfEAJqgFprIfaRCvu+SyOJWtsWJra70hoptjONgNaB 32iq21C2SARArB+m3d242txTFkGcQOIINt3N3iJvA99k+SMA2l+1LJoTou2Tpde0 XVBoE2PFpojw508zy5lNYW1a/YEDzw== =JIsD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WTcFK7zLwtuPcd2Y--