From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: "Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)" <jose.fernandez@linux.dev>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/filemap: stop fault-around when the walk steps back
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 12:12:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aunPI5eOUOAEUa8d@pedro-suse.tail5790ac.ts.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031-jf-mm-filemap-map-pages-lower-bound-v2-1-21029744e589@linux.dev>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 04:33:59AM +0000, Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) wrote:
> filemap_map_pages() can dereference a PTE pointer outside the page table
> it locked. KASAN has reported this as a use-after-free read [1]. The
> same path can also write out of bounds. When the stray entry reads as
> none, the fault-around loop maps a page there with set_pte_range().
>
> Its fault-around loop walks the page cache and moves vmf->pte by the
> change in index. A lower index moves it back. xas_find() can step back
> to a lower index when a multi-index entry is split during the walk.
>
> [1] fixes xas_find(), but the loop still relies on the walk never
> stepping back. Stop the fault-around when the walk steps back. ->fault()
> maps the faulting page if the loop did not.
I'm not sure I understand. xas_find() was fixed. Is there any other case where
this loop can step backwards?
If not, I don't think this should be Cc: stable, and should probably be a WARN_ON().
As it's a hardening patch and not an actual bugfix.
--
Pedro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 4:33 Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)
2026-11-02 17:27 ` Andrew Morton
2026-11-02 21:47 ` Jan Kara
2026-11-03 12:12 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aunPI5eOUOAEUa8d@pedro-suse.tail5790ac.ts.net \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jose.fernandez@linux.dev \
--cc=krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®