From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: use a shared SRCU domain for reset controls
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:18:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1017e06-9a12-4d19-bfda-0b096693f7c6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417154809.1984386-1-steven.price@arm.com>
On 17/04/2026 16:48, Steven Price wrote:
> Commit 78ebbff6d1a0 ("reset: handle removing supplier before consumers")
> added a dynamically initialized srcu_struct to every reset_control and
> cleaned it up again when the handle was dropped.
>
> That breaks early boot users which acquire and release reset handles
> before workqueues are online. On rk3288 this shows up during
> rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(), where pmu_set_power_domain() gets a reset
> control for a CPU core and then drops it again before SMP bring-up has
> finished. cleanup_srcu_struct() then tries to flush delayed SRCU work
> and hits the WARN_ON(!wq_online) path, which can leave the machine
> hanging before the serial console appears.
>
> Keep the supplier-removal protection, but move it to a single shared
> static SRCU domain for the reset core. That preserves the rcdev lifetime
> protection needed for supplier unregister without requiring per-handle
> init_srcu_struct()/cleanup_srcu_struct() on normal get/put paths.
>
> Fixes: 78ebbff6d1a0 ("reset: handle removing supplier before consumers")
Whoops, I forgot by SoB:
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Note I'm not very familiar with this region of code, so let me know if
I'm fixing this in the wrong way. This is a regression for the RK3288
Firefly board I'm using so I'm keen to get some form of fix in.
Thanks,
Steve
> ---
> drivers/reset/core.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 38e189d04d09..ab4989084824 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(reset_list_mutex);
> static LIST_HEAD(reset_controller_list);
> +/*
> + * Use one shared SRCU domain so reset handles don't need per-instance
> + * init/cleanup on early boot paths.
> + */
> +DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(reset_control_srcu);
>
> /* Protects reset_gpio_lookup_list */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(reset_gpio_lookup_mutex);
> @@ -39,7 +44,6 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(reset_gpio_ida);
> * struct reset_control - a reset control
> * @rcdev: a pointer to the reset controller device
> * this reset control belongs to
> - * @srcu: protects the rcdev pointer from removal during consumer access
> * @list: list entry for the rcdev's reset controller list
> * @id: ID of the reset controller in the reset
> * controller device
> @@ -55,7 +59,6 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(reset_gpio_ida);
> */
> struct reset_control {
> struct reset_controller_dev __rcu *rcdev;
> - struct srcu_struct srcu;
> struct list_head list;
> unsigned int id;
> struct kref refcnt;
> @@ -188,7 +191,7 @@ void reset_controller_unregister(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
> */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(rstc, pos, &rcdev->reset_control_head, list) {
> rcu_assign_pointer(rstc->rcdev, NULL);
> - synchronize_srcu(&rstc->srcu);
> + synchronize_srcu(&reset_control_srcu);
> reset_controller_remove(rcdev, rstc);
> }
> }
> @@ -382,9 +385,9 @@ int reset_control_reset(struct reset_control *rstc)
> if (reset_control_is_array(rstc))
> return reset_control_array_reset(rstc_to_array(rstc));
>
> - guard(srcu)(&rstc->srcu);
> + guard(srcu)(&reset_control_srcu);
>
> - rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &rstc->srcu);
> + rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &reset_control_srcu);
> if (!rcdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -503,9 +506,9 @@ int reset_control_assert(struct reset_control *rstc)
> if (reset_control_is_array(rstc))
> return reset_control_array_assert(rstc_to_array(rstc));
>
> - guard(srcu)(&rstc->srcu);
> + guard(srcu)(&reset_control_srcu);
>
> - rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &rstc->srcu);
> + rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &reset_control_srcu);
> if (!rcdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -599,9 +602,9 @@ int reset_control_deassert(struct reset_control *rstc)
> if (reset_control_is_array(rstc))
> return reset_control_array_deassert(rstc_to_array(rstc));
>
> - guard(srcu)(&rstc->srcu);
> + guard(srcu)(&reset_control_srcu);
>
> - rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &rstc->srcu);
> + rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &reset_control_srcu);
> if (!rcdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -679,9 +682,9 @@ int reset_control_status(struct reset_control *rstc)
> if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(rstc)) || reset_control_is_array(rstc))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - guard(srcu)(&rstc->srcu);
> + guard(srcu)(&reset_control_srcu);
>
> - rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &rstc->srcu);
> + rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &reset_control_srcu);
> if (!rcdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -731,9 +734,9 @@ int reset_control_acquire(struct reset_control *rstc)
> if (rstc->acquired)
> return 0;
>
> - guard(srcu)(&rstc->srcu);
> + guard(srcu)(&reset_control_srcu);
>
> - rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &rstc->srcu);
> + rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &reset_control_srcu);
> if (!rcdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -831,7 +834,6 @@ __reset_control_get_internal(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> bool shared = flags & RESET_CONTROL_FLAGS_BIT_SHARED;
> bool acquired = flags & RESET_CONTROL_FLAGS_BIT_ACQUIRED;
> struct reset_control *rstc;
> - int ret;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&rcdev->lock);
>
> @@ -862,14 +864,7 @@ __reset_control_get_internal(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> if (!rstc)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - ret = init_srcu_struct(&rstc->srcu);
> - if (ret) {
> - kfree(rstc);
> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> - }
> -
> if (!try_module_get(rcdev->owner)) {
> - cleanup_srcu_struct(&rstc->srcu);
> kfree(rstc);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> }
> @@ -892,7 +887,7 @@ static void __reset_control_release(struct kref *kref)
> refcnt);
> struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&rstc->srcu);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&reset_control_srcu);
>
> rcdev = rcu_replace_pointer(rstc->rcdev, NULL, true);
> if (rcdev) {
> @@ -911,8 +906,8 @@ static void reset_control_put_internal(struct reset_control *rstc)
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rstc))
> return;
>
> - scoped_guard(srcu, &rstc->srcu) {
> - rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &rstc->srcu);
> + scoped_guard(srcu, &reset_control_srcu) {
> + rcdev = srcu_dereference(rstc->rcdev, &reset_control_srcu);
> if (!rcdev)
> /* Already released. */
> return;
> @@ -921,11 +916,8 @@ static void reset_control_put_internal(struct reset_control *rstc)
> ret = kref_put(&rstc->refcnt, __reset_control_release);
> }
>
> - if (ret) {
> - synchronize_srcu(&rstc->srcu);
> - cleanup_srcu_struct(&rstc->srcu);
> + if (ret)
> kfree(rstc);
> - }
> }
>
> static void reset_gpio_aux_device_release(struct device *dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 15:48 Steven Price
2026-04-20 8:18 ` Steven Price [this message]
2026-04-23 10:27 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-04-23 12:45 ` Steven Price
2026-04-23 14:15 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-04-24 9:04 ` Steven Price
2026-05-14 9:07 ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 21:15 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1017e06-9a12-4d19-bfda-0b096693f7c6@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®