From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@umn.edu>, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko <Vyacheslav.Dubeyko@hgst.com>
Subject: Re: nilfs2: Fix reference count leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_snapshot_group()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 06:51:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4e9eb17-7c5a-15ed-5ff7-2334ff13e9d7@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMV6ehE3jm4ZasYqd12f=e0TNN_kfiX7yCMVHkmESKP0WbuqTw@mail.gmail.com>
> I think there is only one object that can be modified in this function,
Such a view can be reasonable.
> so I didn't mention it.
I suggest to reconsider the conclusion.
>> I guess that an imperative wording is preferred also for this change description.
>
> This sentence is referenced from the code comment, so I haven't change it.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc7/source/lib/kobject.c#L459
I find that that there are further possibilities to consider for improvements
around the presented commit message (even after the mentioned copy
from the function description of this programming interface).
>> How do you think about to combine this update step together with
>> “nilfs2: Fix reference count leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_device_group”
>> into a small patch series?
>
> I'd like to improve the similar issues after I reporting this bunch of bugs.
Did you find questionable implementation details with the help of an evolving
source code analysis tool?
Regards,
Markus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 19:48 [PATCH] " Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <CAMV6ehE3jm4ZasYqd12f=e0TNN_kfiX7yCMVHkmESKP0WbuqTw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-05-29 4:51 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4e9eb17-7c5a-15ed-5ff7-2334ff13e9d7@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Vyacheslav.Dubeyko@hgst.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wu000273@umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®