From: "Mika Penttilä" <mika.penttila@mbosol.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/6] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 07:02:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9cef72f-0bcf-5bd6-e828-f11bd822fe33@mbosol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230603200459.889612295@linutronix.de>
Hi,
On 3.6.2023 23.07, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Putting CPUs into INIT is a safer place during kexec() to park CPUs.
>
> Split the INIT assert/deassert sequence out so it can be reused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -853,47 +853,40 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid,
> return (send_status | accept_status);
> }
>
> -static int
> -wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
> +static void send_init_sequence(int phys_apicid)
> {
> - unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
> - int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
> -
> - maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
> + int maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
>
> - /*
> - * Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors.
> - */
> + /* Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors. */
> if (APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {
> - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
> + /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
> + if (maxlvt > 3)
> apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> }
>
> - pr_debug("Asserting INIT\n");
> -
> - /*
> - * Turn INIT on target chip
> - */
> - /*
> - * Send IPI
> - */
> - apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DM_INIT,
> - phys_apicid);
> -
> - pr_debug("Waiting for send to finish...\n");
> - send_status = safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
> + /* Assert INIT on the target CPU */
> + apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DM_INIT, phys_apicid);
> + safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
>
> udelay(init_udelay);
>
> - pr_debug("Deasserting INIT\n");
> -
> - /* Target chip */
> - /* Send IPI */
> + /* Deassert INIT on the target CPU */
> apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_DM_INIT, phys_apicid);
> + safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Wake up AP by INIT, INIT, STARTUP sequence.
> + */
> +static int wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
> +{
> + unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
> + int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
This seems like an unbalanced preempt disable..
>
> - pr_debug("Waiting for send to finish...\n");
> - send_status = safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
> + send_init_sequence(phys_apicid);
>
> mb();
>
>
--Mika
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-04 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-03 20:06 [patch 0/6] Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() troubles Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:06 ` [patch 1/6] x86/smp: Remove pointless wmb() from native_stop_other_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:06 ` [patch 2/6] x86/smp: Acquire stopping_cpu unconditionally Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 3/6] x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead() Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 4/6] x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:54 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-04 3:19 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-05 7:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 5/6] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-04 4:02 ` Mika Penttilä [this message]
2023-06-04 10:24 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-05 7:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-05 8:23 ` [patch v2 " Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 6/6] x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:57 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-05 17:41 ` [patch 0/6] Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() troubles Sean Christopherson
2023-06-05 22:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-05 23:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06 7:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-07 16:21 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-07 17:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-07 22:19 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-08 3:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-08 4:03 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-16 15:07 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-16 19:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-16 19:03 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-16 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-09 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9cef72f-0bcf-5bd6-e828-f11bd822fe33@mbosol.com \
--to=mika.penttila@mbosol.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®