From: Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] s390/topology: Initialize sbm topology during topology_init_early()
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 12:19:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd5201d9-19bb-410e-8954-6c53a5aeb753@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001192849.74788-8-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
On 01/10/2026 21:28, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> When the topology mode is TOPOLOGY_MODE_HW, topology_init_early()
> already parses the set of socket present on the system.
>
> Use the socket_info to configure the sparsebitmask (sbm) properties for
> the system - namely the number of sockets and maximum threads in a
> socket instance.
>
> arch_sbm_cpu_instance_id() traverses all socket instances to find
> a matching CPU which is not optimal but instance ID is only checked
> when the CPU is coming online. Since this is a rare event, the
> inefficiency is tolerable.
>
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> ---
> Build tested with LKP's s390 randconfig with QEMU cmdline:
>
> qemu-system-s390x \
> -cpu max \
> -smp 2 \
> -m 2048 \
> -kernel ./arch/s390/boot/vmlinux \
> -append "console=ttyAMA0 earlycon ignore_loglevel log_buf_len=10M print_fatal_signals=1 LOGLEVEL=8 sched_debug" \
> -nographic
>
> Note: Since ctop needs KVM acceleration to emulate TOPOLOGY_MODE_HW, the
> actual spasemask setting is only build tested at the moment.
>
> XXX: Any way around this using cross-compile and QEMU?
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> index 1377c6f3f670..80dc51f5ce6f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/sbm.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> @@ -561,6 +562,55 @@ static int __init detect_polarization(union topology_entry *tle)
> return tl_core->pp != POLARIZATION_HRZ;
> }
topology_init_early() is called once during early boot and never again.
Considering that s390's topology can change during runtime this
implementation won't work as sbm won't be able to adapt.
On s390 max_threads_per_instance can change during runtime.
Like sashiko pointed out, this approach also does not consider
any newly added cpus.
IMHO, there is a slight redesign required so that smb_set_topology()
and smb_init() can be called each time a topology rebuild is necessary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 19:28 [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] lib, sched: Introduce sparsebitmap (sbm) K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] lib/sbm: Introduce helpers for architectures to configure LLC properties K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-07 5:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/13] drivers/base/arch_topology: Add support for initializing sbm topology K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] LoongArch: Initialize CPU _PXM relation for disabled CPUs from SRAT K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] LoongArch: Configure sbm topology during SMP preparation K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-07 3:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3.1 " K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] MIPS: Initialize sbm topology on multi-node systems K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/13] powerpc/setup: Initialize sbm topology based on coregroup / NUMA topology K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-07 14:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] s390/topology: Initialize sbm topology during topology_init_early() K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-07 10:19 ` Mete Durlu [this message]
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/13] sparc64: Initialize sbm topology on multi-LLC system K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/13] x86/cpu/topology: Initialize sbm topology after topology parsing K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-03 8:27 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-04 6:17 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-07 3:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3.1 " K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] lib/sbm: Dynamically allocate sbm index when CPU is activated K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] lib/sbm: Add helpers to allocate, set, clear, and traverse the bits on sbm K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] sched/fair: Allocate nohz.idle_cpus_mask during sched_init_smp() K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] sched/fair: Switch nohz.idle_cpus to use sbm K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-03 9:10 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] lib, sched: Introduce sparsebitmap (sbm) Chen Yu
2026-10-04 6:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd5201d9-19bb-410e-8954-6c53a5aeb753@linux.ibm.com \
--to=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®