From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
To: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yuanxzhang@fudan.edu.cn, kjlu@umn.edu, Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial_core: Fix uart_state leak when port shutdown
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:56:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf6c1e7b-3dc6-aba6-955a-fee351a6d800@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592052665-95042-1-git-send-email-xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
On 13. 06. 20, 14:51, Xiyu Yang wrote:
> uart_shutdown() invokes uart_port_lock(), which returns a reference of
> the uart_port object if increases the refcount of the uart_state object
> successfully or returns NULL if fails.
>
> However, uart_shutdown() don't take the return value of uart_port_lock()
> as the new uart_port object to "uport" and use the old "uport" instead
> to balance refcount in uart_port_unlock(), which may cause a redundant
> decrement of refcount occurred when the new "uport" equals to NULL and
> then cause a potential memory leak.
uport should be valid at that point and both the returned one and the
used one should be the same.
> Fix this issue by update the "uport" object to the return value of
> uart_port_lock() when invoking uart_port_lock().
Do you actually encounter the issue or is this some static analyzer result?
> Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index 57840cf90388..ab8756ef2b60 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void uart_shutdown(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state)
> * console driver may need to allocate/free a debug object, which
> * can endup in printk() recursion.
> */
> - uart_port_lock(state, flags);
> + uport = uart_port_lock(state, flags);
> xmit_buf = state->xmit.buf;
> state->xmit.buf = NULL;
> uart_port_unlock(uport, flags);
>
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-15 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-13 12:51 Xiyu Yang
2020-06-15 4:56 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf6c1e7b-3dc6-aba6-955a-fee351a6d800@suse.com \
--to=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tanxin.ctf@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=yuanxzhang@fudan.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®