From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 07/33] KVM: SVM: Prevent debugging under SEV-ES
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 12:02:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c11bde239b08b184f4c4a7306424da1d26dfea20.1601658176.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1601658176.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Since the guest register state of an SEV-ES guest is encrypted, debugging
is not supported. Update the code to prevent guest debugging when the
guest has protected state.
Additionally, an SEV-ES guest must only and always intercept DR7 reads and
writes. Update set_dr_intercepts() and clr_dr_intercepts() to account for
this.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 9 +++++
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index fb0e8a0881f8..5270735bbdd8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -1817,6 +1817,9 @@ static void svm_set_dr6(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned long value)
{
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+ if (svm->vcpu.arch.guest_state_protected)
+ return;
+
if (unlikely(value != vmcb->save.dr6)) {
vmcb->save.dr6 = value;
vmcb_mark_dirty(vmcb, VMCB_DR);
@@ -1827,6 +1830,9 @@ static void svm_sync_dirty_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+ return;
+
get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[0], 0);
get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[1], 1);
get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.db[2], 2);
@@ -1845,6 +1851,9 @@ static void svm_set_dr7(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long value)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+ return;
+
svm->vmcb->save.dr7 = value;
vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_DR);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 09e78487e5d0..e6900c62f164 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -196,6 +196,28 @@ static inline struct kvm_svm *to_kvm_svm(struct kvm *kvm)
return container_of(kvm, struct kvm_svm, kvm);
}
+static inline bool sev_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
+
+ return sev->active;
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
+static inline bool sev_es_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV
+ struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
+
+ return sev_guest(kvm) && sev->es_active;
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
static inline void vmcb_mark_all_dirty(struct vmcb *vmcb)
{
vmcb->control.clean = 0;
@@ -247,21 +269,24 @@ static inline void set_dr_intercepts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
struct vmcb *vmcb = get_host_vmcb(svm);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR0_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR1_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR2_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR3_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR4_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR5_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR6_READ);
+ if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm)) {
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR0_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR1_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR2_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR3_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR4_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR5_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR6_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR0_WRITE);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR1_WRITE);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR2_WRITE);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR3_WRITE);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR4_WRITE);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR5_WRITE);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR6_WRITE);
+ }
+
vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR7_READ);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR0_WRITE);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR1_WRITE);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR2_WRITE);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR3_WRITE);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR4_WRITE);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR5_WRITE);
- vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR6_WRITE);
vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR7_WRITE);
recalc_intercepts(svm);
@@ -273,6 +298,12 @@ static inline void clr_dr_intercepts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
vmcb->control.intercepts[INTERCEPT_DR] = 0;
+ /* DR7 access must remain intercepted for an SEV-ES guest */
+ if (sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm)) {
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR7_READ);
+ vmcb_set_intercept(&vmcb->control, INTERCEPT_DR7_WRITE);
+ }
+
recalc_intercepts(svm);
}
@@ -472,28 +503,6 @@ void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
extern unsigned int max_sev_asid;
-static inline bool sev_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV
- struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
-
- return sev->active;
-#else
- return false;
-#endif
-}
-
-static inline bool sev_es_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV
- struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
-
- return sev_guest(kvm) && sev->es_active;
-#else
- return false;
-#endif
-}
-
static inline bool svm_sev_enabled(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV) ? max_sev_asid : 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 08812eb0b73e..6b9125f49ddc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -9550,6 +9550,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned long rflags;
int i, r;
+ if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
vcpu_load(vcpu);
if (dbg->control & (KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_DB | KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_BP)) {
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-02 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 17:02 [RFC PATCH v2 00/33] SEV-ES hypervisor support Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/33] KVM: SVM: Remove the call to sev_platform_status() during setup Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES capability in KVM Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/33] KVM: SVM: Add GHCB accessor functions for retrieving fields Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for the SEV-ES VMSA Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/33] KVM: x86: Mark GPRs dirty when written Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/33] KVM: SVM: Add required changes to support intercepts under SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/33] KVM: SVM: Do not allow instruction emulation " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/33] KVM: SVM: Cannot re-initialize the VMCB after shutdown with SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/33] KVM: SVM: Prepare for SEV-ES exit handling in the sev.c file Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/33] KVM: SVM: Add initial support for a VMGEXIT VMEXIT Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/33] KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT processing Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x002 Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x004 Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x100 Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/33] KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT MSR protocol processing Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/33] KVM: SVM: Support MMIO for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/33] KVM: SVM: Support port IO operations " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for EFER write traps " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR0 " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR4 " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR8 " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/33] KVM: x86: Update __get_sregs() / __set_sregs() to support SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/33] KVM: SVM: Do not report support for SMM for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/33] KVM: SVM: Guest FPU state save/restore not needed for " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/33] KVM: SVM: Add support for booting APs for an " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/33] KVM: SVM: Add NMI support " Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/33] KVM: SVM: Set the encryption mask for the SVM host save area Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/33] KVM: SVM: Update ASID allocation to support SEV-ES guests Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/33] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU creation/loading Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/33] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU loading Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/33] KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests Tom Lendacky
2020-10-02 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/33] KVM: SVM: Provide support to launch and run an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c11bde239b08b184f4c4a7306424da1d26dfea20.1601658176.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®