mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: babu.moger@amd.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com,
	amitsinght@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:37:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf4fa9e8-b810-35c8-d383-4ed345e0ce76@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d28db1a-196d-4aaf-922a-12ce31d71aa2@amd.com>

Hi Babu,

On 09/11/2023 20:42, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 10/25/23 13:03, James Morse wrote:
>> MPAM's cache occupancy counters can take a little while to settle once
>> the monitor has been configured. The maximum settling time is described
>> to the driver via a firmware table. The value could be large enough
>> that it makes sense to sleep. To avoid exposing this to resctrl, it
>> should be hidden behind MPAM's resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
>>
>> resctrl_arch_rmid_read() may be called via IPI meaning it is unable
>> to sleep. In this case resctrl_arch_rmid_read() should return an error
>> if it needs to sleep. This will only affect MPAM platforms where
>> the cache occupancy counter isn't available immediately, nohz_full is
>> in use, and there are no housekeeping CPUs in the necessary domain.
>>
>> There are three callers of resctrl_arch_rmid_read():
>> __mon_event_count() and __check_limbo() are both called from a
>> non-migrateable context. mon_event_read() invokes __mon_event_count()
>> using smp_call_on_cpu(), which adds work to the target CPUs workqueue.
>> rdtgroup_mutex() is held, meaning this cannot race with the resctrl
>> cpuhp callback. __check_limbo() is invoked via schedule_delayed_work_on()
>> also adds work to a per-cpu workqueue.
>>
>> The remaining call is add_rmid_to_limbo() which is called in response
>> to a user-space syscall that frees an RMID. This opportunistically
>> reads the LLC occupancy counter on the current domain to see if the
>> RMID is over the dirty threshold. This has to disable preemption to
>> avoid reading the wrong domain's value. Disabling pre-emption here
>> prevents resctrl_arch_rmid_read() from sleeping.

> I dont know what did you mean by "This has to disable preemption to
> avoid reading the wrong domain's value."

Pre-emption lets this thread be scheduled out, and potentially scheduled back in on a
different CPU, possibly in a different domain. Any code with the concept of 'this domain'
has to to ensure it can't be migrated. Disabling pre-emption is the most common way of
doing that.

Disabling pre-emption also prevents the thread from sleeping, because it can't be
scheduled out.


> Who is disabling the preemption here? Is that specific to ARM?
> Can you please make that clear? Or Am i missing something?

add_rmid_to_limbo() is calling get_cpu(), which raises the pre-empt counter.
If it only wanted the CPU number it could have just called smp_processor_id() - but that
wouldn't be safe because the thread can be migrated, meaning the cpu number can change.

All this is to ensure that cpumask_test_cpu() and resctrl_arch_rmid_read() run on the same
CPU.


Thanks,

James

>> add_rmid_to_limbo() walks each domain, but only reads the counter
>> on one domain. If the system has more than one domain, the RMID will
>> always be added to the limbo list. If the RMIDs usage was not over the
>> threshold, it will be removed from the list when __check_limbo() runs.
>> Make this the default behaviour. Free RMIDs are always added to the
>> limbo list for each domain.
>>
>> The user visible effect of this is that a clean RMID is not available
>> for re-allocation immediately after 'rmdir()' completes, this behaviour
>> was never portable as it never happened on a machine with multiple
>> domains.
>>
>> Removing this path allows resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep if its called
>> with interrupts unmasked. Document this is the expected behaviour, and
>> add a might_sleep() annotation to catch changes that won't work on arm64.


>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index fa3319021881..409817b0ae2c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -464,17 +464,7 @@ static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
>>  	idx = resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_encode(entry->closid, entry->rmid);
>>  
>>  	entry->busy = 0;
>> -	cpu = get_cpu();
>>  	list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
>> -		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &d->cpu_mask)) {
>> -			err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(r, d, entry->closid,
>> -						     entry->rmid,
>> -						     QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID,
>> -						     &val);
>> -			if (err || val <= resctrl_rmid_realloc_threshold)
>> -				continue;
>> -		}
>> -
>>  		/*
>>  		 * For the first limbo RMID in the domain,
>>  		 * setup up the limbo worker.
>> @@ -484,15 +474,10 @@ static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
>>  		set_bit(idx, d->rmid_busy_llc);
>>  		entry->busy++;
>>  	}
>> -	put_cpu();
>>  
>> -	if (entry->busy) {
>> -		rmid_limbo_count++;
>> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
>> -			closid_num_dirty_rmid[entry->closid]++;
>> -	} else {
>> -		list_add_tail(&entry->list, &rmid_free_lru);
>> -	}
>> +	rmid_limbo_count++;
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
>> +		closid_num_dirty_rmid[entry->closid]++;
>>  }
>>  


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-14 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 18:03 [PATCH v7 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 01/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 02/24] x86/resctrl: kfree() rmid_ptrs from rdtgroup_exit() James Morse
2023-11-09 17:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:03     ` James Morse
2023-12-13 23:27       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 18:28         ` James Morse
2023-12-14 19:06           ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-15 17:40             ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:28   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:03     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 03/24] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-11-09 17:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:28   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:03     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 04/24] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2023-11-09 20:29   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:03     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 05/24] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2023-11-09 17:41   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:03     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:31   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:04     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 06/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-10-31  7:43   ` [EXT] " Amit Singh Tomar
2023-12-11 14:33     ` James Morse
2024-01-21 10:27       ` Amit Singh Tomar
2024-01-22 18:07         ` James Morse
2023-11-09 17:42   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:04     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:32   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 07/24] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2023-11-09 17:42   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:32   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has James Morse
2023-11-09 17:43   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:04     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:38   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:04     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 09/24] x86/resctrl: Use __set_bit()/__clear_bit() instead of open coding James Morse
2023-11-09 17:44   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:05     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:38   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:05     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 10/24] x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by searching closid_num_dirty_rmid James Morse
2023-11-09 17:46   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:36     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:39   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 11/24] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2023-11-09 20:39   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:39   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 12/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow James Morse
2023-11-09 17:46   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:40   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 13/24] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2023-11-09 17:46   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:40   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2023-11-09 17:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:37     ` James Morse
2023-12-14 18:52       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:42   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37     ` James Morse [this message]
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 15/24] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2023-11-09 20:47   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 16/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2023-11-09 20:47   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 17/24] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2023-11-09 20:48   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 18/24] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2023-11-09 20:48   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 19/24] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2023-11-09 20:51   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 20/24] x86/resctrl: Add CPU online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-11-09 20:51   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2023-11-09 17:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:38     ` James Morse
2023-12-14 18:53       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-15 17:41         ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:51   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 22/24] x86/resctrl: Add CPU offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-11-09 20:52   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:39     ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 23/24] x86/resctrl: Move domain helper migration into resctrl_offline_cpu() James Morse
2023-11-09 20:52   ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 24/24] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2023-11-09 17:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:39     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:52   ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:39     ` James Morse
2023-11-09 14:05 ` [PATCH v7 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:39   ` James Morse
2023-11-13  1:54 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-12-14 18:28   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf4fa9e8-b810-35c8-d383-4ed345e0ce76@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®