From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: babu.moger@amd.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com,
amitsinght@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:37:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf4fa9e8-b810-35c8-d383-4ed345e0ce76@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d28db1a-196d-4aaf-922a-12ce31d71aa2@amd.com>
Hi Babu,
On 09/11/2023 20:42, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 10/25/23 13:03, James Morse wrote:
>> MPAM's cache occupancy counters can take a little while to settle once
>> the monitor has been configured. The maximum settling time is described
>> to the driver via a firmware table. The value could be large enough
>> that it makes sense to sleep. To avoid exposing this to resctrl, it
>> should be hidden behind MPAM's resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
>>
>> resctrl_arch_rmid_read() may be called via IPI meaning it is unable
>> to sleep. In this case resctrl_arch_rmid_read() should return an error
>> if it needs to sleep. This will only affect MPAM platforms where
>> the cache occupancy counter isn't available immediately, nohz_full is
>> in use, and there are no housekeeping CPUs in the necessary domain.
>>
>> There are three callers of resctrl_arch_rmid_read():
>> __mon_event_count() and __check_limbo() are both called from a
>> non-migrateable context. mon_event_read() invokes __mon_event_count()
>> using smp_call_on_cpu(), which adds work to the target CPUs workqueue.
>> rdtgroup_mutex() is held, meaning this cannot race with the resctrl
>> cpuhp callback. __check_limbo() is invoked via schedule_delayed_work_on()
>> also adds work to a per-cpu workqueue.
>>
>> The remaining call is add_rmid_to_limbo() which is called in response
>> to a user-space syscall that frees an RMID. This opportunistically
>> reads the LLC occupancy counter on the current domain to see if the
>> RMID is over the dirty threshold. This has to disable preemption to
>> avoid reading the wrong domain's value. Disabling pre-emption here
>> prevents resctrl_arch_rmid_read() from sleeping.
> I dont know what did you mean by "This has to disable preemption to
> avoid reading the wrong domain's value."
Pre-emption lets this thread be scheduled out, and potentially scheduled back in on a
different CPU, possibly in a different domain. Any code with the concept of 'this domain'
has to to ensure it can't be migrated. Disabling pre-emption is the most common way of
doing that.
Disabling pre-emption also prevents the thread from sleeping, because it can't be
scheduled out.
> Who is disabling the preemption here? Is that specific to ARM?
> Can you please make that clear? Or Am i missing something?
add_rmid_to_limbo() is calling get_cpu(), which raises the pre-empt counter.
If it only wanted the CPU number it could have just called smp_processor_id() - but that
wouldn't be safe because the thread can be migrated, meaning the cpu number can change.
All this is to ensure that cpumask_test_cpu() and resctrl_arch_rmid_read() run on the same
CPU.
Thanks,
James
>> add_rmid_to_limbo() walks each domain, but only reads the counter
>> on one domain. If the system has more than one domain, the RMID will
>> always be added to the limbo list. If the RMIDs usage was not over the
>> threshold, it will be removed from the list when __check_limbo() runs.
>> Make this the default behaviour. Free RMIDs are always added to the
>> limbo list for each domain.
>>
>> The user visible effect of this is that a clean RMID is not available
>> for re-allocation immediately after 'rmdir()' completes, this behaviour
>> was never portable as it never happened on a machine with multiple
>> domains.
>>
>> Removing this path allows resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep if its called
>> with interrupts unmasked. Document this is the expected behaviour, and
>> add a might_sleep() annotation to catch changes that won't work on arm64.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index fa3319021881..409817b0ae2c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -464,17 +464,7 @@ static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
>> idx = resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_encode(entry->closid, entry->rmid);
>>
>> entry->busy = 0;
>> - cpu = get_cpu();
>> list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
>> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &d->cpu_mask)) {
>> - err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(r, d, entry->closid,
>> - entry->rmid,
>> - QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID,
>> - &val);
>> - if (err || val <= resctrl_rmid_realloc_threshold)
>> - continue;
>> - }
>> -
>> /*
>> * For the first limbo RMID in the domain,
>> * setup up the limbo worker.
>> @@ -484,15 +474,10 @@ static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
>> set_bit(idx, d->rmid_busy_llc);
>> entry->busy++;
>> }
>> - put_cpu();
>>
>> - if (entry->busy) {
>> - rmid_limbo_count++;
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
>> - closid_num_dirty_rmid[entry->closid]++;
>> - } else {
>> - list_add_tail(&entry->list, &rmid_free_lru);
>> - }
>> + rmid_limbo_count++;
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
>> + closid_num_dirty_rmid[entry->closid]++;
>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 18:03 [PATCH v7 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 01/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 02/24] x86/resctrl: kfree() rmid_ptrs from rdtgroup_exit() James Morse
2023-11-09 17:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:03 ` James Morse
2023-12-13 23:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 18:28 ` James Morse
2023-12-14 19:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-15 17:40 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:28 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:03 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 03/24] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-11-09 17:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:28 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:03 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 04/24] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2023-11-09 20:29 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:03 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 05/24] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2023-11-09 17:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:03 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:31 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:04 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 06/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-10-31 7:43 ` [EXT] " Amit Singh Tomar
2023-12-11 14:33 ` James Morse
2024-01-21 10:27 ` Amit Singh Tomar
2024-01-22 18:07 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 17:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:04 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:32 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 07/24] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2023-11-09 17:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:32 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has James Morse
2023-11-09 17:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:04 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:38 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:04 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 09/24] x86/resctrl: Use __set_bit()/__clear_bit() instead of open coding James Morse
2023-11-09 17:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 18:05 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:38 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-13 18:05 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 10/24] x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by searching closid_num_dirty_rmid James Morse
2023-11-09 17:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:36 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 11/24] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2023-11-09 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 12/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow James Morse
2023-11-09 17:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:40 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 13/24] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2023-11-09 17:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:40 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2023-11-09 17:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:37 ` James Morse
2023-12-14 18:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 20:42 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:37 ` James Morse [this message]
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 15/24] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2023-11-09 20:47 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 16/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2023-11-09 20:47 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 17/24] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2023-11-09 20:48 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 18/24] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2023-11-09 20:48 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 19/24] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2023-11-09 20:51 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 20/24] x86/resctrl: Add CPU online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-11-09 20:51 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2023-11-09 17:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:38 ` James Morse
2023-12-14 18:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-15 17:41 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:51 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:38 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 22/24] x86/resctrl: Add CPU offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-11-09 20:52 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:39 ` James Morse
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 23/24] x86/resctrl: Move domain helper migration into resctrl_offline_cpu() James Morse
2023-11-09 20:52 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 18:03 ` [PATCH v7 24/24] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2023-11-09 17:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-14 11:39 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 20:52 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:39 ` James Morse
2023-11-09 14:05 ` [PATCH v7 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Moger, Babu
2023-12-14 11:39 ` James Morse
2023-11-13 1:54 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-12-14 18:28 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf4fa9e8-b810-35c8-d383-4ed345e0ce76@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®