From: "lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
To: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
"lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"zyjzyj2000@gmail.com" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
"jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"aharonl@nvidia.com" <aharonl@nvidia.com>,
"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mbloch@nvidia.com" <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
"liweihang@huawei.com" <liweihang@huawei.com>,
"liangwenpeng@huawei.com" <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>,
"yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
"rpearsonhpe@gmail.com" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
"y-goto@fujitsu.com" <y-goto@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 08/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush execution in responder side
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 01:43:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d78ef78d-4a57-16cf-00d0-9b129f1eaad4@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40fe1dc1-1ef6-63cd-267b-21f7498cd203@talpey.com>
On 05/01/2022 00:40, Tom Talpey wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2021 3:07 AM, Li Zhijian wrote:
>
>> +static enum resp_states process_flush(struct rxe_qp *qp,
>> + struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt)
>> +{
>> + u64 length = 0, start = qp->resp.va;
>> + u32 sel = feth_sel(pkt);
>> + u32 plt = feth_plt(pkt);
>> + struct rxe_mr *mr = qp->resp.mr;
>> +
>> + if (sel == IB_EXT_SEL_MR_RANGE)
>> + length = qp->resp.length;
>> + else if (sel == IB_EXT_SEL_MR_WHOLE)
>> + length = mr->cur_map_set->length;
>
> I noticed another issue in this. When the "Memory Region" flag is
> set, the RETH:VA field in the request is ignored, in addition to
> the RETH:DMALEN. Therefore, both the start and length must be set
> from the map.
Yes, that's true
Actually, i have drafted a new version last week when you first time pointed out this.
https://github.com/zhijianli88/linux/commit/a368d821b163f74836d527638625d414c7a62d00#diff-1b675c68d2f5f664abefea05cbf415f6307c9920b31a13bed41105c4a84e0259R641
the latest code is like:
if (sel == IB_EXT_SEL_MR_RANGE) {
start = qp->resp.va;
length = qp->resp.length;
} else { /* sel == IB_EXT_SEL_MR_WHOLE */
start = mr->cur_map_set->iova;
length = mr->cur_map_set->length;
}
>
> Is the mr->cur_map_set[0]->addr field a virtual address, or a
> physical?
mr->cur_map_set[0]->addr is a virtual address in kernel space.
nvdimm_flush_iova() will accept a user space address(alloc(), mmap() by applications),
this address could be transited to a kernel virtual address by lookup_iova() where it
will refer to mr->cur_map_set[n]->addr.
So i think we should use qp->resp.va and mr->cur_map_set->iova that are both user
space address.
> I can't find the cur_map_set in any patch.
cur_map_set will be filled in rxe_mr_init_user(),
rxe_mr_init_user()
-> ib_umem_get()
-> pin_user_pages_fast()
-> update cur_map_set
BTW: some of you all comments are already addressed in
https://github.com/zhijianli88/linux/tree/rdma-flush
and it may forced update irregularly.
Thanks
Zhijian
> The virtual
> (mapped) address will be needed, to pass to arch_wb_cache_pmem().
>
> Something like this?
>
> if (sel == IB_EXT_SEL_MR_WHOLE) {
> length = mr->cur_map_set->length;
> start = mr->cur_map_set[0]->addr;
> }
>
> (in addition to my other review suggestions about 0-length, etc...)
>
> Tom.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-28 8:07 [RFC PATCH rdma-next 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RDMA FLUSH operation Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: mr: Introduce is_pmem Li Zhijian
2022-01-06 0:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:12 ` lizhijian
2022-01-14 8:10 ` Li, Zhijian
2022-01-27 22:30 ` Jeff Moyer
2022-01-16 18:11 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-18 8:55 ` lizhijian
2022-01-18 15:28 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-19 2:01 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 02/10] RDMA: Allow registering MR with flush access flags Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering FLUSH flags for supported device only Li Zhijian
2022-01-06 0:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:20 ` lizhijian
2022-01-13 6:43 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 04/10] RDMA/rxe: Enable IB_DEVICE_RDMA_FLUSH for rxe device Li Zhijian
2022-01-06 0:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:26 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 05/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering persistent flag for pmem MR only Li Zhijian
2021-12-30 22:25 ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31 3:34 ` lizhijian
2021-12-31 14:40 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-04 1:32 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 06/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement RC RDMA FLUSH service in requester side Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 07/10] RDMA/rxe: Set BTH's SE to zero for FLUSH packet Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 08/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush execution in responder side Li Zhijian
2021-12-30 22:18 ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31 1:37 ` lizhijian
2021-12-31 2:32 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-04 8:51 ` lizhijian
2022-01-04 16:02 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-06 0:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-04 16:40 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-05 1:43 ` lizhijian [this message]
2022-01-06 0:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:42 ` lizhijian
2022-01-06 17:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-10 5:45 ` lizhijian
2022-01-10 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-11 5:34 ` lizhijian
2022-01-11 20:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-12 9:50 ` lizhijian
2022-01-12 13:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-13 6:29 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 09/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush completion Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 10/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RD FLUSH service support Li Zhijian
2021-12-29 8:49 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RDMA FLUSH operation Gromadzki, Tomasz
2021-12-29 14:35 ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31 1:10 ` lizhijian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d78ef78d-4a57-16cf-00d0-9b129f1eaad4@fujitsu.com \
--to=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=aharonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=liangwenpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liweihang@huawei.com \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
--cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®